2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.chieco.2019.101349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experimental investigation of bilateral oligopoly in emissions trading markets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A firm’s absorptive capacity displays its potential to take in, recognize, and apply outside knowledge. Absorptive capacity has become increasingly important in fostering innovative performance and competitive capabilities [ 26 ].…”
Section: Theoretical Basementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A firm’s absorptive capacity displays its potential to take in, recognize, and apply outside knowledge. Absorptive capacity has become increasingly important in fostering innovative performance and competitive capabilities [ 26 ].…”
Section: Theoretical Basementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Two Control Zones (TCZ) policy, the first acknowledged target-based air pollution control strategy in history, has been extensively studied as a quasi-natural experiment to investigate the effects of China’s environmental regulations on pollution reduction, economic growth [ 25 ], infant mortality [ 26 ], and foreign direct investments [ 27 ]. The Key Cities for Air Pollution Control (KCAPC) concept was first put forth in an official document (known as the “two compliance policy”) by the Ministry of Environmental Protection (MEP) in 1998 to enhance the air quality in several significant cities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike traditional command-based environmental regulatory instruments, firms participating in the pilot carbon trading market have the flexibility to decide whether to continue production until the marginal cost of emission reduction is in line with the current trading price (Dai, 2019;Niizawa et al, 2020), without fear of shutting down production or paying a penalty higher than the marginal cost of emission reduction. However, with the increasingly stringent allocation of carbon allowances in various pilot carbon trading markets, although enterprises can respond by actively reducing production or purchasing corresponding carbon credits in the carbon trading market, in the long run, these measures largely run counter to their goal of profit maximization Tanaka et al, 2020). At the same time, as an important market incentive and environmental regulation tool to achieve the "double carbon" target in China, the carbon emission trading pilot will play its role in the long run.…”
Section: Theoretical Analysis and Research Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%