AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference 2012
DOI: 10.2514/6.2012-4542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Experimental Evaluation of Bayesian Soft Human Sensor Fusion in Robotic Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case where the reference state parameter X l is fixed, the language generation problem reduces to the problem defined by (12)- (13); note that ζ(•) is a deterministic function. This problem formulation can be extended to the case of a more complex K-hypotheses belief expression "The target is <hypothesis 1>, or <hypothesis 2>, or ... , <hypothesis K>," with…”
Section: A Mixture Of Statements (Mos)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case where the reference state parameter X l is fixed, the language generation problem reduces to the problem defined by (12)- (13); note that ζ(•) is a deterministic function. This problem formulation can be extended to the case of a more complex K-hypotheses belief expression "The target is <hypothesis 1>, or <hypothesis 2>, or ... , <hypothesis K>," with…”
Section: A Mixture Of Statements (Mos)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous research [2], [13], a human-to-robot information sharing technique was developed to handle language understanding subproblem involved in step (1) and information fusion subproblem involved in steps (2) and (3) of the information exchange loop. However, the robot's belief generated in (3) is directly communicated to the human audience in its raw format of a pdf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these techniques are based on structured verbal communication interfaces that can fail to adequately capture the intended meaning of a human observation, especially in large unstructured or featureless environments, e.g. outdoor spaces [22]. Furthermore, these techniques assume that human sensor models are perfectly known and obtainable via offline calibration, which can be very time-consuming and is not robust to unanticipated semantic context shifts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Approaches based on semantic codebook likelihood models, such as the ones proposed in [2,19], are generally effective and allow users to supply useful information via simple high-level language. However, they can lead to suboptimal fusion results and user frustration in actual spatial state estimation applications, since all soft observations about the continuous target state space must be expressed via finite semantic dictionaries and structured synatx, which may not adequately cover or succinctly describe all possible spatial target configurations [22]. While it is always possible to resort to more sophisticated interfaces or natural language processing techniques to account for such cases, in practice this increases the complexity of the user interface and fusion problem, and can make learning of p(ζ i k |X) significantly more difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%