2014 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/smc.2014.6974511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A touch interface for soft data modeling in Bayesian estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kaupp et al [6] and Wang et al [10] extend the core concept one step further to consider how uncertainties in human sensor model parameters can be accounted for in data fusion using maximum likelihood estimation, whereas Ahmed et al [4] considers a fully Bayesian reasoning approach. Dani et al [11], Mehta et al [12], and Bishop et al [13] have also considered alternative human-machine communication interfaces and probabilistic models for soft data fusion in dynamic target tracking problems. However, a key assumption for data modeling and fusion in all these works is that observations from a single observation remain i.i.d.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kaupp et al [6] and Wang et al [10] extend the core concept one step further to consider how uncertainties in human sensor model parameters can be accounted for in data fusion using maximum likelihood estimation, whereas Ahmed et al [4] considers a fully Bayesian reasoning approach. Dani et al [11], Mehta et al [12], and Bishop et al [13] have also considered alternative human-machine communication interfaces and probabilistic models for soft data fusion in dynamic target tracking problems. However, a key assumption for data modeling and fusion in all these works is that observations from a single observation remain i.i.d.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8 While humans are not able to observe and report measurements as quickly as automated sensors, they outperform algorithms in terms of situational awareness. This includes recognizing threats in an environment.…”
Section: [ Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 An alternative approach to using humans as sensors is to allow each human to report measurements graphically. 7 This can be done using a touch-based interface where the person directly manipulates a point cloud that represents an assessment of the target state. This requires that the human has some basic level of training so that the person is able to accurately represent his or her uncertainty in the measurement by appropriately drawing the point cloud.…”
Section: Human Assisted Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This avoids incorrectly biasing or collapsing state probability distributions in the presence of imperfect human sensing, thereby improving collaborative human-robot sensing for object/world state estimation. PSDA naturally integrates with existing hybrid 'soft-hard' Bayesian data fusion schemes developed in earlier work for collaborative human-robot team sensing [5], [6], [10]- [13]. Furthermore, although PSDA requires knowledge of additional human sensing characteristics like false positive rates, it is robust to modest mismatches between assumed and actual human sensor parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%