2018
DOI: 10.1109/tia.2018.2801863
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Experimental Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning Techniques for Motor Fault Diagnosis Under Various Operating Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1) RQA + SVM [19]: independent use of RQA for feature learning and optimal binary tree SVM for classification (2) LSTM: independent use of the proposed LSTM architecture on raw data 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 98.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (3) MLP [7]: multilayer neural network on statistical features (4) CNN [32]: one-dimension CNN on raw data (5) SIFT + CNN [13]: short-time Fourier transform for feature learning and CNN for classification (6) CDFL [14]: convolutional discriminative learning of a BP network…”
Section: Performance Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(1) RQA + SVM [19]: independent use of RQA for feature learning and optimal binary tree SVM for classification (2) LSTM: independent use of the proposed LSTM architecture on raw data 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 98.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (3) MLP [7]: multilayer neural network on statistical features (4) CNN [32]: one-dimension CNN on raw data (5) SIFT + CNN [13]: short-time Fourier transform for feature learning and CNN for classification (6) CDFL [14]: convolutional discriminative learning of a BP network…”
Section: Performance Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, owing to the significant development of the computing ability [6], massive efforts for motor fault diagnosis have been devoted to the data-driven approaches. For instance, Diazet provided an experimental comparative evaluation of various classifiers including k-NN, Bagging, AdaBoost, and SVM for motor fault detection [7]. Zhang presented a motor fault identification method through sparse representation and achieved good robustness to noise [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the fault diagnosis method based on the support vector machine (SVM) is employed in [37,38] for motor faults. Moreover, classifiers based on C4.5, K-nearest neighbors (k-NNs), and multilayer perceptron (MLP) are discussed in [39,40] to recognize faults.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commonly, the diagnosis and predictions is calculated through current signature analysis (MCSA) [50,51], i.e., examining the output signals of the motor stator's current while running on a steady-state operating mood [52][53][54][55][56]. MCSA analyses the timefrequency decomposition of the current signals or by faults' frequencies in the frequency domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%