1965
DOI: 10.1016/0005-7967(65)90005-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experimental analysis oe the effect of rhythm on the speech of stutterers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
21
0
1

Year Published

1967
1967
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
4
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Little carry-over was seen; stuttering returned to its former level within 5 min after the rhythm was discontinued. The arhythmic stimulus did not reduce stuttering to any degree for any subject, thereby confirming the finding of Fransella and Beech (1965) that arhythmic stimuli did not reduce stuttering. Stuttering was reduced during the spontaneous speech task as well as during the reading task.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Little carry-over was seen; stuttering returned to its former level within 5 min after the rhythm was discontinued. The arhythmic stimulus did not reduce stuttering to any degree for any subject, thereby confirming the finding of Fransella and Beech (1965) that arhythmic stimuli did not reduce stuttering. Stuttering was reduced during the spontaneous speech task as well as during the reading task.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Second, the study examined this metronome effect as an instance of the more general synchronization effect with the objective of providing the needed theoretical basis for its existence other than as an artifact of distraction. If the reduction of stuttering is attributable to the rhythm itself, then a tactual rhythm should also be effective, as suggested by the results of Barber (1940), but pulses that are not rhythmic should have no effect on stuttering, as suggested by the results of Fransella and Beech (1965). The present study, therefore, used a tactual rhythm and an arhythmic comparison procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations