2015
DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyv059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An exophytic hepatic metastasis of mucinous colon cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The accuracy of preoperative MRI in determining the presence of mucin in a CRCLM appears to be limited based on the data available from our study, with a sensitivity of 31.3% when the radiologist is blinded to the histological subtype. While there are some publications documenting the features of mucinous CRCLM on different imaging modalities, there appears to be a paucity of data on the performance of MRI at detecting the presence of mucin in CRCLM (24,(30)(31)(32). There is a single study that demonstrates a sensitivity of 56% when a combination of MRI and PET are used to try and detect mucin in CRCLM, clearly the routine use of PET to determine the presence of mucin cannot be recommended with a sensitivity of only 56%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of preoperative MRI in determining the presence of mucin in a CRCLM appears to be limited based on the data available from our study, with a sensitivity of 31.3% when the radiologist is blinded to the histological subtype. While there are some publications documenting the features of mucinous CRCLM on different imaging modalities, there appears to be a paucity of data on the performance of MRI at detecting the presence of mucin in CRCLM (24,(30)(31)(32). There is a single study that demonstrates a sensitivity of 56% when a combination of MRI and PET are used to try and detect mucin in CRCLM, clearly the routine use of PET to determine the presence of mucin cannot be recommended with a sensitivity of only 56%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have described the imaging features of metastatic mucinous adenocarcinomas of the liver by using various imaging modalities. [5][6][7]16,17 Metastatic mucinous adenocarcinomas of the liver frequently show hypoechoic or anechoic echogenicity on ultrasonography, liquid attenuation on CT, and bright SI on T 2 weighted MR images that is similar to the SI of the cerebrospinal fluid, with rim enhancement, internal septa, or mural nodules after contrast enhancement. 6,16,17 In contrast, hepatic metastases from colorectal adenocarcinomas other than mucinous adenocarcinomas usually show a moderately high SI on T 2 weighted images.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7]16,17 Metastatic mucinous adenocarcinomas of the liver frequently show hypoechoic or anechoic echogenicity on ultrasonography, liquid attenuation on CT, and bright SI on T 2 weighted MR images that is similar to the SI of the cerebrospinal fluid, with rim enhancement, internal septa, or mural nodules after contrast enhancement. 6,16,17 In contrast, hepatic metastases from colorectal adenocarcinomas other than mucinous adenocarcinomas usually show a moderately high SI on T 2 weighted images. 5,18 Because metastatic mucinous adenocarcinomas of the liver may show bright SI on T 2 weighted MR images due to abundant mucin production from the tumor, 16 metastatic mucinous adenocarcinomas of the liver may be difficult to differentiate from simple cysts of the liver when the former have no enhancing solid portions or mural nodules.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exophytic patterns of liver tumours were previously described for liver haemangioma (12), adenoma (13), focal nodular hyperplasia (10,14,15), angiomyolipoma (16), solitary fibrous tumour (17), hepatocellular carcinoma (18), cholangiocarcinoma (19) and metastases (20).…”
Section: Discussion Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%