2018
DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentiating metastatic mucinous colorectal adenocarcinomas from simple cysts of the liver using contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI

Abstract: On contrast-enhanced and DW MRI, rim and intracystic enhancement can be helpful for differentiating metastatic mucinous colorectal adenocarcinomas from simple cysts of the liver.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the combination of these signs has been shown to be 95% specific for the diagnosis of mucinous metastases [47]. Moreover, the ADC values of mucinous metastases tend to be lower, with higher signal intensity on hepatobiliary phase images compared to cysts [47]. These features are consistent with the presence of fibrotic tissue surrounding the extracellular mucin pools.…”
Section: Ct and Mrimentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, the combination of these signs has been shown to be 95% specific for the diagnosis of mucinous metastases [47]. Moreover, the ADC values of mucinous metastases tend to be lower, with higher signal intensity on hepatobiliary phase images compared to cysts [47]. These features are consistent with the presence of fibrotic tissue surrounding the extracellular mucin pools.…”
Section: Ct and Mrimentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Peripheral rim or subtle inner enhancement can help exclude simple benign hepatic cysts. Indeed, the combination of these signs has been shown to be 95% specific for the diagnosis of mucinous metastases [47]. Moreover, the ADC values of mucinous metastases tend to be lower, with higher signal intensity on hepatobiliary phase images compared to cysts [47].…”
Section: Ct and Mrimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variable. (36) Variable (27,36) Delayed enhancement, less than fibrosis (26,27,36,40) Increased ADC value (41) Fibrosis (Figures 3C,D,H) Low signal relative to liver (27) Low signal relative to liver (27,36) Late enhancement (26,42,43) Increased ADC value (44, 45) Mucin (Figures 3E, F) High signal (46) Low signal (46) No enhancement (46) Increased ADC value (46)…”
Section: T2 Signal T1 Signal Enhancement Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Defining the internal composition of metastases may help to categorise tumour biology and thus influence immunological and surgical strategy recently described Consensus Molecular Subtypes (CMS) of colorectal liver metastases ( 11 ), can be characterized by particular histopathological features and could be categorized by imaging. The molecular subtyping of liver metastases may be important even in patients when a resected primary tumour specimen is available, as significant discordance exists between primary and metastatic molecular subtypes ( 46 , 48 , 49 ). Within-patient heterogeneity is implicated as the root cause of a variable immunological response between primary and metastatic lesions ( 50 , 51 ).…”
Section: Radiopathological Features Of Crlmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been some discussion regarding the ability of preoperative imaging techniques such as positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to determine whether or not a CRCLM contains mucin ( 21 , 22 ). Several features on MRI such as high signal intensity on T2 weighted imaging and rim enhancement can be helpful in identifying mucinous CRCLM, however, not all cases can be identified by these features ( 23 , 24 ). The relevance in determining whether a CRCLM contains mucin or not is unknown and in some cases metastatic lesions may have a mucin component which is due to preoperative treatment response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%