Abstract:Promoting wellness within academia reduces disease frequency and enhances overall health. This study examined wellness factors among undergraduate students attending a research university (n = 85) or a small liberal arts college (n = 126). Participants were administered surveys which measured physical, emotional, social, intellectual, and occupational wellness. Significant institutional differences emerged on measures of physical and social wellness. When collapsed across academic institutions, students who we… Show more
“…One study demonstrated an increase in students' level of wellness with class standing (Oleckno & Blacconiere, 1990), while others noted a decline in nutrition and stress management during the first year (LaFountaine et al, 2006). Another showed students attending a liberal arts college were more physically active, compared to those attending a research college (Baldwin et al, 2017); however, the researchers note that these findings could be attributed to gender.…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…These units offer frequent events tailored to specific subpopulations (e.g., year of study, gender, sexual orientation), on a particular health topic (e.g., smoking, vaping, drinking). The programs are designed to improve students' physical and mental health (Slavin, Schindler, & Chibnall, 2014), promote psychosocial and stress management techniques (Conley, Travers, & Bryant, 2013), decrease depression and anxiety (Dvořáková et al, 2017), and develop positive health behaviors to enhance students' quality of life (Baldwin, Towler, Oliver, & Datta, 2017). For example, participation in a mindfulness-based program has been shown to increase first-year college students' life satisfaction, and decrease their depression and anxiety (Dvořáková et al, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous researchers have examined wellness differences between traditional and non-traditional students (Myers & Mobley, 2004), year of study (LaFountaine et al, 2006), gender (Baldwin et al, 2017;LaFountaine, 2009;Wharf Higgins et al, 2010;Stock et al, 2001), institution type (Baldwin et al, 2017), and college athletics (Beauchemin, 2014;LaFountaine, 2009). Such studies have yielded mixed results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant differences have been reported for gender. Males are consistently noted to be more physically active compared to females (Baldwin et al, 2017;LaFountaine, 2009;Myers & Mobley, 2004), reported higher levels of wellness, specifically those related to physical, emotional, and social wellness than their female counterparts (Myers & Mobley, 2004), and scored higher in their sense of worth and social relationships compared to females (LaFountaine, 2009). These findings contradict other studies that report females are more knowledgeable and better at practicing health prevention behaviors than their male counterparts (Wharf Higgins et al, 2010;Stock et al, 2001), and experience a greater feeling of belonging due to their social relationships (Baldwin et al, 2017).…”
Background: Despite the many campus-based wellness programs and services offered through entities such as student services, many U.S. students lack the strategies, skills, or support systems to manage stress or change pre-existing behaviors, resulting in unhealthy behaviors and poor overall wellness. Since patterns developed during this time can form a solid foundation for future health behaviors, there is a need to develop and design wellness programs that stimulate positive health-behavior change.Aim: The purpose of this study was to assess student wellness of college students at a four-year public university to inform campus-based health programs, events, and services.Methods: An anonymous, single-structured survey was administered at an on-campus event (N = 225). The instrument covered six dimensions of wellness: physical wellness, social wellness, intellectual wellness, emotional wellness, spiritual wellness, and environmental wellness.Results: Significant differences for gender were found in the dimensions of social wellness, emotional wellness, and physical wellness. Females reported higher levels of social and emotional wellness, while males reported higher levels of physical wellness. Differences in age for emotional wellness, and year of study for physical wellness were also found.Conclusions: Findings provide insight to direct interventions and programs that would enhance students' wellness knowledge and behaviors.
“…One study demonstrated an increase in students' level of wellness with class standing (Oleckno & Blacconiere, 1990), while others noted a decline in nutrition and stress management during the first year (LaFountaine et al, 2006). Another showed students attending a liberal arts college were more physically active, compared to those attending a research college (Baldwin et al, 2017); however, the researchers note that these findings could be attributed to gender.…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…These units offer frequent events tailored to specific subpopulations (e.g., year of study, gender, sexual orientation), on a particular health topic (e.g., smoking, vaping, drinking). The programs are designed to improve students' physical and mental health (Slavin, Schindler, & Chibnall, 2014), promote psychosocial and stress management techniques (Conley, Travers, & Bryant, 2013), decrease depression and anxiety (Dvořáková et al, 2017), and develop positive health behaviors to enhance students' quality of life (Baldwin, Towler, Oliver, & Datta, 2017). For example, participation in a mindfulness-based program has been shown to increase first-year college students' life satisfaction, and decrease their depression and anxiety (Dvořáková et al, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous researchers have examined wellness differences between traditional and non-traditional students (Myers & Mobley, 2004), year of study (LaFountaine et al, 2006), gender (Baldwin et al, 2017;LaFountaine, 2009;Wharf Higgins et al, 2010;Stock et al, 2001), institution type (Baldwin et al, 2017), and college athletics (Beauchemin, 2014;LaFountaine, 2009). Such studies have yielded mixed results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant differences have been reported for gender. Males are consistently noted to be more physically active compared to females (Baldwin et al, 2017;LaFountaine, 2009;Myers & Mobley, 2004), reported higher levels of wellness, specifically those related to physical, emotional, and social wellness than their female counterparts (Myers & Mobley, 2004), and scored higher in their sense of worth and social relationships compared to females (LaFountaine, 2009). These findings contradict other studies that report females are more knowledgeable and better at practicing health prevention behaviors than their male counterparts (Wharf Higgins et al, 2010;Stock et al, 2001), and experience a greater feeling of belonging due to their social relationships (Baldwin et al, 2017).…”
Background: Despite the many campus-based wellness programs and services offered through entities such as student services, many U.S. students lack the strategies, skills, or support systems to manage stress or change pre-existing behaviors, resulting in unhealthy behaviors and poor overall wellness. Since patterns developed during this time can form a solid foundation for future health behaviors, there is a need to develop and design wellness programs that stimulate positive health-behavior change.Aim: The purpose of this study was to assess student wellness of college students at a four-year public university to inform campus-based health programs, events, and services.Methods: An anonymous, single-structured survey was administered at an on-campus event (N = 225). The instrument covered six dimensions of wellness: physical wellness, social wellness, intellectual wellness, emotional wellness, spiritual wellness, and environmental wellness.Results: Significant differences for gender were found in the dimensions of social wellness, emotional wellness, and physical wellness. Females reported higher levels of social and emotional wellness, while males reported higher levels of physical wellness. Differences in age for emotional wellness, and year of study for physical wellness were also found.Conclusions: Findings provide insight to direct interventions and programs that would enhance students' wellness knowledge and behaviors.
“…Noticeably, discourses of SM user are also on health. As cited by [31], students reported that stress and sleep difficulties negatively impacted their academic performance. Moreover, many college students engage themselves in unhealthy behaviours, making them at risk for developing serious problems in health in the future.…”
Higher Education Institutions in the Philippines integrate social media like Facebook to market their brand, give some announcements, update news and other important information about their institution. However, their stakeholders create unofficial Facebook pages associated to their institution. These pages are areas for students mostly to react to posts, comment, give their opinion on a given topic and share their daily life online in an informal and casual way. These social media footprints were used in the data mining process to identify their discourse. With this, Universities and Colleges could form decision-making mediations and improve the quality of education and service they provide. The specific objectives of this study are: to create a workflow on how to analyze social media data; to use Naï ve Bayes Algorithm in classifying the discourse of Philippine HEI stakeholders; and to deduce the results of data mining and recommend intervention activities to improve quality education. Knowledge Discovery Databases (KDD) was used in the study. The result of the data mining process is displayed through a word cloud and a dynamic graph visualizing the classifications of posts and comments. Social engagement, academics, emotions, health, policies and finances were identified as the SM discourse of Philippine HEI Stakeholders.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.