2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.12.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An exact -constraint method for bi-objective combinatorial optimization problems: Application to the Traveling Salesman Problem with Profits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
107
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 316 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
107
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This method is one of the most well-known approaches for dealing with the multi-objective optimization problems, which solves such problems by transferring all the objective functions, except one, to the constraints at each stage. In fact, in this method, one of the objectives of the given problem is optimized as the main objective relative to the other objectives as constraints, which is called epsilon constraint (Ehrgott, 2005;Bérubé et al, 2009). This method was first developed by Haimes et al (1971) and, then, its details were described in Changkong and Haimes (1983) study.…”
Section: Solution and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is one of the most well-known approaches for dealing with the multi-objective optimization problems, which solves such problems by transferring all the objective functions, except one, to the constraints at each stage. In fact, in this method, one of the objectives of the given problem is optimized as the main objective relative to the other objectives as constraints, which is called epsilon constraint (Ehrgott, 2005;Bérubé et al, 2009). This method was first developed by Haimes et al (1971) and, then, its details were described in Changkong and Haimes (1983) study.…”
Section: Solution and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paquete and Stützle (2003) develop a two-phase local search method and Jaszkiewicz and Zielniewicz (2009) consider a Pareto memetic algorithm using path relinking and Pareto local search. Jozefowiez et al (2008), Karademir (2008) and Bérubé et al (2009) consider a special traveling salesperson problem (TSP), TSP with profits. Jozefowiez et al approximate the nondominated frontier by an evolutionary algorithm (EA), Karademir proposes a genetic algorithm and Bérubé generates the nondominated frontier using the ε-constraint method (see Chankong and Haimes 1983).…”
Section: Generalized Biobjective Traveling Salesperson Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a Pareto-based approach could also support the identification of preferences by providing the decision-maker with a set of feasible, objectively equally-valued, highquality solutions as an excellent starting point for selecting the (subjectively) best solution. In the literature on Pareto-based approaches, there are few reports on exact algorithms for solving multi-objective problems (e.g., Dhaenens, Lemesre, and Talbi 2010, Bérubé, Gendreau, and Potvin 2009, Mezmaz, Melab, and Talbi 2007. However, the applicability of exact algorithms still is often limited to rather small instances.…”
Section: Multi-objective Optimization Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%