An evaluation of wear when enamel is opposed by various ceramic materials and gold

Elmaria, Asmaa; Goldstein, Gary R.; Vijayaraghavan, T.V.; LeGeros, R.Z.; Hittelman, Eugene

doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.09.002

Cited by 81 publications

(62 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…20 It may be supposed that gold-based alloys hardly interfere with the occlusal balance of patients subjected to prosthetic rehabilitations. 21 The unsightly display of metal is considered one of the main disadvantages of using gold occlusal surfaces.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Wear Properties of a Novel Resin Composite Compared to Human Enamel and Other Restorative Materials

D’Arcangelo¹,

Vanini²,

Rondoni³

et al. 2014

Operative Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the two-body wear resistance of human enamel, a pressable glass-ceramic (Imagine PressX), a type 3 gold alloy (Aurocast8), three resins composites currently available on the market (Enamel plus HRi, Filtek Supreme XTE, Ceram.X duo), and one recently introduced resin composite (Enamel plus HRi-Function). Resin composites were tested after simple light curing and after a further heat polymerization cycle. Ten cylindrical specimens (7 mm in diameter) were manufactured with each dental material according to standard laboratory procedures. Ten flat enamel specimens were obtained from freshly extracted human molars and included in the control group. All samples were subjected to a two-body wear test in a dual-axis chewing simulator over up to 120,000 loading cycles, against yttria stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal cusps. Wear resistance was analyzed by measuring the vertical substance loss (mm) and the volume loss (mm(3)). Antagonist wear (mm) was also recorded. Data were statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (wear depth and volume loss) and Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA on ranks (antagonist wear). Heat-cured HRi function and Aurocast8 showed similar mean values for wear depth and volumetric loss, and their results did not statistically differ in comparison with the human enamel.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Wear Properties of a Novel Resin Composite Compared to Human Enamel and Other Restorative Materials

D’Arcangelo¹,

Vanini²,

Rondoni³

et al. 2014

Operative Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…12 In recent years, many studies have determined that a polished ceramic surface causes less enamel wear than a glazed surface. [13][14][15][16][17] This information could indicate that polishing alone is acceptable after chairside adjustment. 12 The wear behavior of ceramics is different from that of metal or composite resin.…”

mentioning

confidence: 94%

Wear of human enamel opposing monolithic zirconia, glass ceramic, and composite resin: An in vitro study

Sripetchdanond

Leevailoj

2014

The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

178

144

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…1 Previous studies have shown a correlation between the surface roughness of the restorative material and the wear of opposing enamel. 16,17 This makes it important to know the roughness values of materials used to fabricate crowns, before and after mastication. The surface structure and roughness of a restoration have more effect on opposing tooth structure than the hardness of a ceramic.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of simulated mastication on the surface roughness of three ceramic systems

Amer

Kürklü

Johnston

2015

The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An evaluation of wear when enamel is opposed by various ceramic materials and gold

Cited by 81 publications

References 34 publications

Wear Properties of a Novel Resin Composite Compared to Human Enamel and Other Restorative Materials

Wear Properties of a Novel Resin Composite Compared to Human Enamel and Other Restorative Materials

Wear of human enamel opposing monolithic zirconia, glass ceramic, and composite resin: An in vitro study

Effect of simulated mastication on the surface roughness of three ceramic systems

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About