1974
DOI: 10.2466/pms.1974.39.1.631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Evaluation of Various Parameters of Maturity at Birth as Predictors of Development at One Year of Life

Abstract: The comparative value of various parameters of neonatal maturity for predicting the development of the infant at 1 yr. was assessed for a sample of 233 low-birth-weight and full-sized infants. The 4 “traditional” infancy-status measures (birth weight, gestational age, birth length, and head circumference) predicted the 1-yr. outcome measures best, the infancy-status variables, in general, contributing independently to outcome even when demographic predictors were included in multiple regression analyses. The C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Foster infant temperament was assessed using the Infant Behavior Questionnaire and the Early Childhood Behavior Questionnaire (Gartstein & Rothbart, ; Rothbart, ). Infants with scores that fell 2 SD or more above the mean on the soothability subscale were coded as “high risk.” Prematurity was determined if the infant either weighed < 2500 g at birth or was born at < 32 weeks gestation (or both), following guidelines in previous studies (Caputo et al., ; Minde, ). Two or more foster placements were coded as “high risk,” as established in previous research (Lewis, Dozier, Ackerman, & Sepulveda‐Kozakowski, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foster infant temperament was assessed using the Infant Behavior Questionnaire and the Early Childhood Behavior Questionnaire (Gartstein & Rothbart, ; Rothbart, ). Infants with scores that fell 2 SD or more above the mean on the soothability subscale were coded as “high risk.” Prematurity was determined if the infant either weighed < 2500 g at birth or was born at < 32 weeks gestation (or both), following guidelines in previous studies (Caputo et al., ; Minde, ). Two or more foster placements were coded as “high risk,” as established in previous research (Lewis, Dozier, Ackerman, & Sepulveda‐Kozakowski, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these, 367 came from mental health centers in both large and small cities in Florida and Louisiana, 73 came from private practitioners in New Orleans and Baton Rouge, and 15 were brain-damaged children from Baton Rouge (Fitch,Note 1). The 823 other children included 65 from a longitudinal study of prematurely born children in New York (Caputo et al, 1974). The remainder came from Florida and Louisiana.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perinatal variables such as hypoxia or low birth weight have shown moderate positive correlations with cognitive and motor outcome measures (Smith, Flick, Ferriss, & Sellman, 1972; Werner, Simonian, Bierman, & French, 1967), but recent studies have indicated that a complex network of associations must be considered, since children with similar perinatal insults may have quite different developmental courses (Cohen, Parmelee, Beckwith, & Sigman, 1986; Cohen, Sigman, Parmelee, & Beckwith, 1982; Escalona, 1982). Risk index systems based on combinations of demographic, biological, and environmental variables have been developed for predicting motor, language, and cognitive development (Caputo et al, 1974; Field, Hallock, Ting, Dempsey, Dabiri, & Shuman, 1978; Parmelee, Sigman, Kopp, & Haber, 1975; Ramey, Stedman, Borders-Patterson, & Mengel, 1978; Siegel, 1982; Siegel et al, 1982). Having specified a population of infants as being high-risk, the problem becomes one of early detection and delineation of abnormalities so that early intervention can be arranged.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%