1988
DOI: 10.1037/h0079933
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Minnesota Infant Development Inventory in the developmental screening of high-risk infants at eight months.

Abstract: A parent-completed questionnaire, the Minnesota Infant Development Inventory (MIDI) (Ircton & Thwing, 1980), was compared to Bayley Mental Scale scores for 44 male and 42 female high-risk 8-month-olds. Categorization of infants as delayed or not delayed on each of the five subscales of the MIDI showed good overall agreement (81% to 90%) with Bayley findings. Categorization of infants based on their lowest MIDI subscale score yielded good sensitivity (85%) in detecting delay and fair specificity (77%) in identi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This raises the concern that mothers might over‐ or misreport their infants’ developmental milestone achievement. However, previous research demonstrated moderate to good overall agreement between MIDI scores and the tester‐administered Bayley Scales 14,24 . Within our study, delayed overall infant development as measured by the MIDI strongly predicted non‐optimal neuromotor development, as observed by research nurses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This raises the concern that mothers might over‐ or misreport their infants’ developmental milestone achievement. However, previous research demonstrated moderate to good overall agreement between MIDI scores and the tester‐administered Bayley Scales 14,24 . Within our study, delayed overall infant development as measured by the MIDI strongly predicted non‐optimal neuromotor development, as observed by research nurses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The accessory age level was defined as the age at which at least 75% of children in an American normative sample had mastered this skill 13 (there are no European norms). Results for each scale were interpreted as delayed if scores fell 25/100 below age cut‐off, reflecting a deviance of the developmental age of at least 3 months below the actual child age at milestone assessment in line with the age cut‐off used previously 14 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some PCDQs that include measures of early motor development are the Minnesota Infant Development Inventory (MIDI, Creighton & Sauve, 1988; Ireton & Thwing, 1980), the Child Development Review – Parent Questionnaire (CDP-PQ, Ireton, 1996), the Child Development Inventory (CDI, Ireton & Glascoe, 1995), and the Ages & Stages Questionnaire (ASQ, Squires, Bricker, & Potter, 1997). Among these PCDQs, only the IDI and the ASQ cover early motor development during the first two years of life.…”
Section: 1 the Role Of Early Motor Skills In Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MIDI has been demonstrated to exhibit good sensitivity to developmental delay, and to yield adequate agreement with the Bayley Scales of Infant Development in a sample of high-risk 8-month-old infants (Creighton & Sauve 1988). For the purposes of this study, developmental quotients were computed by dividing each MIDI scale score by age.…”
Section: Minnesota Infant Development Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purposes of this study, developmental quotients were computed by dividing each MIDI scale score by age. Using such quotients, Creighton and Sauve (1988) found that the MIDI gross motor developmental score was the strongest predictor of the Bayley Mental Development Index. Gross motor developmental quotients of 0.70 or less, therefore, were categorized as indicating delayed development.…”
Section: Minnesota Infant Development Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%