1997
DOI: 10.1080/10903129708958783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of the pneumatic anti-shock garment (pasg) in various clinical settings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22,23 Although the garment is used rarely as a therapeutic intervention for shock, in our case it elicited a marked response and allowed maintenance of an improved blood pressure during the initial 24 hours of treatment. Immediately after inflation of the suit's compressive trousers, a 10 mm Hg increase in diastolic pressures was noted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…22,23 Although the garment is used rarely as a therapeutic intervention for shock, in our case it elicited a marked response and allowed maintenance of an improved blood pressure during the initial 24 hours of treatment. Immediately after inflation of the suit's compressive trousers, a 10 mm Hg increase in diastolic pressures was noted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…[1425–29] It also stated that MAST was helpful and probably not harmful (Class II b evidence) in elderly with a history of congestive hart failure, who have penetrating abdominal injuries, uncontrolled gynecologic and lower limb haemorrhage, septic and spinal shock. [2329–31] MAST application is contraindicated (Class III evidence) in patients with diaphragmatic injury, thoracic injury, abdominal evisceration and gravid uterus among others. MAST is not used as an adjunct to Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).…”
Section: Mast and The Emsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a 1983 study, it was found that in 136 cardiac arrest patients who were older than 20 years old, the survival to hospital was 9% as compared to 4% in the usual care group. [29]…”
Section: Mast and The Emsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, no clear evidence exists for their use in blunt injury cases at this time. However, some EMS systems still recommend use of the PASG as a pneumatic splint for suspected pelvic fractures, which could pose a risk of life‐threatening haemorrhage 52–54 . Again, no clear evidence exists for this proposed use.…”
Section: Post‐traumatic Haemorrhagementioning
confidence: 99%