2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-005-0039-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of systemic inflammatory response syndrome signs in the Sepsis Occurrence in Acutely ill Patients (SOAP) study

Abstract: Although common in the ICU, SIRS has prognostic importance in predicting infections, severity of disease, organ failure and outcome.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
82
2
14

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
82
2
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous consensus definitions included the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) criteria, which consisted of temperature, white blood cell count, heart rate, and respiratory rate (3,4). However, SIRS criteria have been criticized for their poor specificity, with 90% of intensive care unit (ICU) patients and 50% of general ward patients meeting the criteria at some point during their hospitalization (5)(6)(7). This led the authors of the 2016 sepsis guidelines to use a more data-driven approach to developing the definition of sepsis (8,9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous consensus definitions included the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) criteria, which consisted of temperature, white blood cell count, heart rate, and respiratory rate (3,4). However, SIRS criteria have been criticized for their poor specificity, with 90% of intensive care unit (ICU) patients and 50% of general ward patients meeting the criteria at some point during their hospitalization (5)(6)(7). This led the authors of the 2016 sepsis guidelines to use a more data-driven approach to developing the definition of sepsis (8,9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, SIRS is important [5] as a descriptor for infected and noninfected patients sharing similar characteristics [4]. It is a sensitive tool for the early recognition of risk for mortality and morbidity [6], identifying patients with increased prevalence of infections [7,8] severity of disease [5,8], organ failure [5] and mortality [5,7,9]. SIRS has been incorporated as inclusion criteria in many sepsis trials [10] and used in quality improvement initiatives and management bundles to improve sepsis care [11].…”
Section: The Badmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, not all have considered the SIRS criteria useful, arguing that they are too sensitive and non-specific to be of any real use in clinical diagnosis or in the clinical trial setting [6]. Indeed, most intensive care unit (ICU) patients and many general ward patients meet the SIRS criteria [7][8][9][10][11]; in the recent Sepsis Occurrence in Acutely ill Patients (SOAP) study, 93% of ICU admissions had at least two SIRS criteria at some point during their ICU stay [11]. In addition, a ''diagnosis'' of SIRS provides no real information regarding the underlying disease process; each of the SIRS criteria can be present in many conditions.…”
Section: Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndromementioning
confidence: 99%