2019
DOI: 10.1186/s12903-019-0767-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of superhydrophilic surfaces of dental implants - a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Background The characteristics of a dental implant surface have a decisive influence on the process of osseointegration. According to the current state of knowledge, surface modification can not only affect the morphology of cells, and in this way have a positive impact on osseointegration. Methods The objective of this study was to compare survival rates and marginal bone loss as well as assess the degree of stability of Straumann SLAactive® and Thomenn Incell® implant… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(57 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nanostructured implant surfaces, which have an extensive surface area, high surface free energy, and wettability, seem capable of modifying the host tissue response [9]. SA implant surfaces have demonstrated predictable clinical results and are regarded as standard implant surface [10,[26][27][28][29]. The superhydrophilicity of SA + VUV + BS, which was previously found on the flat surface of disks [15], was confirmed in our test of static surface wettability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Nanostructured implant surfaces, which have an extensive surface area, high surface free energy, and wettability, seem capable of modifying the host tissue response [9]. SA implant surfaces have demonstrated predictable clinical results and are regarded as standard implant surface [10,[26][27][28][29]. The superhydrophilicity of SA + VUV + BS, which was previously found on the flat surface of disks [15], was confirmed in our test of static surface wettability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The hydrophilic surface implants modified with hydroxyl ion have been assessed for primary and secondary stability only in two other studies to date. Primary stability in the mentioned studies' plants amounted to 57.3 (±7.4) ISQ and raised to 71.3 (±8.2) ISQ while loading [28]. The above-mentioned studies mostly focused on measuring the stability of conventionally loaded implants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, early loading of the implant allows for establishing a peri-implant junction sooner, contributing a biological seal and preventing peri-implant sulcus from bacterial ingrowth. This can provide a higher chance to maintain crestal bone level [ 21 , 22 , 23 ]. However, what is worth noticing is that the group of thick biotype was still characterized by statistically important lower MBL levels in comparison to thin biotype.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%