An evaluation of recycling schemes for waste dry batteries – a simulation approach

Lin, Shui-Shun; Chiu, K.C.

doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.045

Cited by 20 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This exposed that the recycler cannot function efficiently without the cooperation of other stakeholders of the framework. This is in line with the assertions given by Lin and Chiu (2015). The recycler’s payoff shift shown in Figure 3c demonstrated that the recycler can make a 2P or 3P coalition with any stakeholder except a 2P coalition with RCB.…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 86%

“…Funds for the board are generated through the ‘advanced disposal fee’ policy. Lin and Chiu (2015) reviewed this scheme and compared it with a ‘deposit system’ coupled with PRO. They simulated the results and found that implementation of such schemes could be more cost-effective and better for increasing its social acceptability.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The present study is motivated by the researchers’ work on the deposit-refund system that aims to develop EPR schemes for a variety of products (Cahill et al, 2010; Kaushal and Nema, 2013a; Lin and Chiu, 2015; Silveira and Chang, 2011) and these are discussed in the literature review section. These studies present the framework of EPR schemes with a wide range of models but the economic accountability of the stakeholders (SCMs) during simulation of EPR policy has not been focused upon with reference to the market scenario of a particular area.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Multi-stakeholder policy modeling for collection and recycling of spent portable battery waste

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Policies have been structured for collection and recycling of spent portable battery waste within a framework of stakeholders (recycling council body, producer, recycler and consumer) especially for those battery units that are discarded worldwide because of their expensive cost of recycling. Applicability of stakeholders' policies in their coalition framework have been reviewed and critically analyzed using the Shapley value of cooperative game theory models. Coalition models for 'manufacturer and recycler' indicated the dominating role of manufacturers over the recyclers, and waste management is highly influenced by producer responsibility. But, the take-back policy enables recyclers' dominance role in the management and yields maximum benefit to both recyclers and consumers. The polluter pays principle has been implemented in formulating policies to key stakeholders, 'manufacturers' as well as 'consumers', of battery products by the introduction of penalties to encourage their willingness to join the Environment, Health and Safety program. Results indicated that the policies of the framework have the potential to be implemented within a marginal rise in battery price by 12% to 14.3% in the range of recycling cost per tonne of US$2000 to US$5000. The policy of the stakeholders' framework presented in the study could be an important aid to achieve high collection and recycling rates of spent portable batteries.

show abstract

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 86%

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Multi-stakeholder policy modeling for collection and recycling of spent portable battery waste

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Besides, spent LIBs can cause potential risks for public health from both poisonous electrolytes and possible explosion (Wang et al, 2014; Yu et al, 2014). Therefore, recycling of spent LIBs is not only beneficial to the environment but may also result in economic benefits (Lin and Chiu, 2015).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sustainable recovery of valuable metals from spent lithium-ion batteries using DL-malic acid: Leaching and kinetics aspect

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An eco-friendly and benign process has been investigated for the dissolution of Li, Co, Ni, and Mn from the cathode materials of spent LiNiCoMnO batteries, using DL-malic acid as the leaching agent in this study. The leaching efficiencies of Li, Co, Ni, and Mn can reach about 98.9%, 94.3%, 95.1%, and 96.4%, respectively, under the leaching conditions of DL-malic acid concentration of 1.2 M, hydrogen peroxide content of 1.5 vol.%, solid-to-liquid ratio of 40 g l, leaching temperature of 80°C, and leaching time of 30 min. In addition, the leaching kinetic was investigated based on the shrinking model and the results reveal that the leaching reaction is controlled by chemical reactions within 10 min with activation energies (Ea) of 21.3 kJ·mol, 30.4 kJ·mol, 27.9 kJ·mol, and 26.2 kJ·mol for Li, Co, Ni, and Mn, respectively. Diffusion process becomes the controlled step with a prolonged leaching time from 15 to 30 min, and the activation energies (Ea) are 20.2 kJ·mol, 28.9 kJ·mol, 26.3 kJ·mol, and 25.0 kJ·mol for Li, Co, Ni, and Mn, respectively. This hydrometallurgical route was found to be effective and environmentally friendly for leaching metals from spent lithium batteries.

show abstract

“…The most recent outcomes of those projects/research have been published referring to mostly favor sustainable technologies for recycling and reuse of various resources that include energy recovery from organic fraction of municipal solid wastes (Cesaro et al 2016), from food wastes (Karmee 2016), from wastewater treatment plant sludge (Batstone et al 2015;ColmenarSantos et al 2016), compost recovery from organic fraction of municipal solid waste (Cesaro et al 2015), and fertilizers from wastewater (Hukari et al 2016;Puchongkawarin et al 2015;Shepherd et al 2016). Various industrial wastes have been recycled to produce new products or reuse in the process purposes such as vehicle recycling processes , recycling schemes for waste dry batteries (Lin and Chiu 2015), of waste aggregate in cement bound mixtures for road pavement bases and sub-base (Pasetto and Baldo 2016), of waste automotive laminated glass and valorization of polyvinyl butyral (Swain et al 2015), of blast furnace sludge (Drobíková et al 2016), and recycling of electronic wastes (Awasthi et al 2016). Besides advanced treatment technologies among which membranes are the common ones, have been applied for recycling and reuse of urban (Bunani et al 2013) and industrial wastewaters (Zheng et al 2015).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Sustainable technologies for recycling and reuse: an overview

Meriç

Selçuk

Onat

et al. 2018

Environ Sci Pollut Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An evaluation of recycling schemes for waste dry batteries – a simulation approach

Cited by 20 publications

References 8 publications

Multi-stakeholder policy modeling for collection and recycling of spent portable battery waste

Multi-stakeholder policy modeling for collection and recycling of spent portable battery waste

Sustainable recovery of valuable metals from spent lithium-ion batteries using DL-malic acid: Leaching and kinetics aspect

Sustainable technologies for recycling and reuse: an overview

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About