1979
DOI: 10.1016/0091-6749(79)90024-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of pharmacotherapy for exercise-induced asthma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction has not been studied in such detail, particularly for early time points such as 5 and 30 min as in the present study. The magnitude of protection found was within the values reported for formoterol [5,6], salmeterol [11,12] and terbutaline [14,15] indicating that study conditions and subjects enrolled were similar to those of previous protocols. It also suggests that the observation of a similar protection for formoterol and salmeterol 5-30 min after inhalation fits with previous data using longer intervals of time.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction has not been studied in such detail, particularly for early time points such as 5 and 30 min as in the present study. The magnitude of protection found was within the values reported for formoterol [5,6], salmeterol [11,12] and terbutaline [14,15] indicating that study conditions and subjects enrolled were similar to those of previous protocols. It also suggests that the observation of a similar protection for formoterol and salmeterol 5-30 min after inhalation fits with previous data using longer intervals of time.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…These children are often discouraged from physical activities for fear of breathlessness. The currently available beta 2 -adrenoceptor agonists by the inhaled route will prevent EIA in about 90% of patients when given prior to activity [1]. However, the duration of their protective effect is usually less than 2 h [2,3], probably because of the hydrophilic nature of these agents and their rapid clearance from the airways [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BALF cell profile data also suggest that challenge with warm, wet air [10,11,13], and pretreatment with β-agonists [14,15], attenuate AIB and significantly protect the canine mucosa from airway desiccation, when compared to untreated dry air challenged segments. In addition to β-agonists [14][15][16], methylxanthines [16,17], muscarinic receptor antagonists [13,18], cyclo-oxygenase inhibitors [11,13,19], leukotriene antagonists [20,21], and airway cooling [6][7][8][9] reduce or abolish AIB in canine peripheral airways and individuals with asthma.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%