1999
DOI: 10.1029/1999jd900120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of NCEP Eta model predictions of surface energy budget and cloud properties by comparison with measured ARM data

Abstract: Abstract.Time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(3 reference statements)
3
25
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Hinkelman et al (1999) find that the Eta Model has more inaccurately predicted clouds than correctly predicted clouds (based primarily on cloud height), as evaluated with observations at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) site in Oklahoma. In the Arctic, the greatest disagreement between eight different regional climate models was found in the predicted cloud cover, which led to errors in the surface radiation fluxes and 2-m temperature (Rinke et al 2006) as evaluated with data from the SHEBA project.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Hinkelman et al (1999) find that the Eta Model has more inaccurately predicted clouds than correctly predicted clouds (based primarily on cloud height), as evaluated with observations at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) site in Oklahoma. In the Arctic, the greatest disagreement between eight different regional climate models was found in the predicted cloud cover, which led to errors in the surface radiation fluxes and 2-m temperature (Rinke et al 2006) as evaluated with data from the SHEBA project.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These observations have been used to evaluate a number of numerical weather prediction (NWP) models (e.g. Mace et al, 1998;Hinkelman et al, 1999;Hogan et al, 2001;Morcrette, 2002;Guichard et al, 2003;Sengupta et al, 2004;Yang et al, 2006;Illingworth et al, 2007;Hogan et al, 2009;Bouniol et al, 2010;Paquin-Ricard et al, 2010). In the work presented here, we sample four months and compare short-range forecasts with ground-based observations of liquid and ice cloud fraction at five locations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hogan et al, 2001;Yang et al, 2006;Illingworth et al, 2007), cloud frequency of occurrence (e.g. Mace et al, 1998;Hinkelman et al, 1999;Hogan et al, 2001Hogan et al, , 2009Bouniol et al, 2010), cloud fraction histograms (e.g. Hogan et al, 2001;Illingworth et al, 2007;Bouniol et al, 2010;PaquinRicard et al, 2010) and contingency tables and skill scores (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naúltima década, as RNAs tem tido uma crescente aplicação na estimativa e previsão de disponibilidade de recursos energéticos renováveis [11,[39][40][41]. Apesar de tratar-se de uma ferramenta estatística que considera relações empíricas entre as variáveis meteorológicas, as RNAs tem-se apresentado como um método alternativo com boa destreza frente a problemas não-lineares ou de natureza estocástica como os complexos processos físicos que influenciam na disponibilidade de energia solar e eólica [14].…”
Section: Aplicações Das Redes Neurais Artificiais Na Estimativa De Reunclassified
“…No entanto, as previsões fornecidas por esses modelos, para um ou dois dias de antecedência, apresentam desvios elevados em relação a valores medidos em superfície [8]. Estudos anteriores apontam como causa principal desses desvios elevados a dependência da irradiação solar em relaçãoà cobertura de nuvens eàs condições meteorológicas que envolvem intrinsecamente processos físicos não-lineares de difícil parametrização [11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified