2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.03.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of H13 tool steel deformation in hot forging conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…due to its strong temper resistance and ability to maintain high hardness and strength at elevated temperatures [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. During working processes such as die casting, tool steel molds are heated using molten metals, which is then followed by cooling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…due to its strong temper resistance and ability to maintain high hardness and strength at elevated temperatures [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. During working processes such as die casting, tool steel molds are heated using molten metals, which is then followed by cooling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hot-work tool steels fabricated by conventional methods require expensive dedicated tools and thus are not suitable for small-scale production and the production of complex shapes [5][6][7]. An additive manufacturing (AM) technique, which builds parts from 3D digital models typically by a layer additive process, has been an effective method to solve these problems [9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fillet radius (2 mm) has been carefully selected to ensure that surface changes on the die insert are attributable to abrasive and adhesive wear. This geometry eliminates plastic deformation of the die insert [13].…”
Section: Hot Forging Standard Test Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar analysis was carried out for HS/SM samples, as shown in Figure 5. The AISI H13 shows a tempered martensitic structure [25], as can be seen in Figure 5a. In this sample, the interface is not clearly identified, but is possible to note a different appearance between the 3D-printed material near the AISI H13 steel and the 3D-printed material distant from the interface (both zones are marked by arrows in Figure 5b).…”
Section: Metallographic Analysismentioning
confidence: 91%