1989
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(89)90047-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of chewing function of complete denture wearers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
106
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
106
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, masticatory ability was selfassessed by means of a questionnaire designed by Sato et al 11 They surveyed the clinical chewing ability of 110 CD wearers to validate the reliability and reported that the mean score of wearers who were satisfied was 58.7; partly satisfied, 48.5; and not satisfied, 32.4. These results suggested that the questionnaire corresponded closely to masticatory ability and was also useful for chair-side evaluation.…”
Section: 13mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, masticatory ability was selfassessed by means of a questionnaire designed by Sato et al 11 They surveyed the clinical chewing ability of 110 CD wearers to validate the reliability and reported that the mean score of wearers who were satisfied was 58.7; partly satisfied, 48.5; and not satisfied, 32.4. These results suggested that the questionnaire corresponded closely to masticatory ability and was also useful for chair-side evaluation.…”
Section: 13mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Masticatory ability was self-assessed by means of a questionnaire designed by Sato et al 11 The survey included questions on the chewing of the following 20 items arranged from easy-to hard-to-chew food: tofu, omelette, boiled potato, boiled carrot, bean sprouts, fish cake, potato chips, burdock, rice-cake cubes, roast meat, peanuts, pickled radish, hard cracker, hard rice cracker, cockle, hard pickled radish, dried squid, dried scallop, chewing gum, and whole apple. The subject was asked to classify each of the 20 food items as ''easy to chew'', ''difficult to chew'', or ''impossible to chew'' without exception.…”
Section: Self-assessed Masticatory Abilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of mastication disorder, the chewing score was 65%, and chewing function was judged to be level IV according to the Sato evaluation. 4 Teeth #11 and #45 were judged to be unsalvageable due to root fracture and irremediable caries, respectively.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the students surveyed the chewing function score, 11 and obtained VAS scale scores evaluating the esthetics and stability of RPDs. Both of them seem to be clinically acceptable and indicate that patients are willing to use students' RPDs.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Rpdsmentioning
confidence: 99%