Patients with removable partial dentures or complete dentures do not demonstrate masticatory function to the same level as patients with a full set of natural teeth. The purpose of this study was to characterize the relationship between reduction of masticatory function, in terms of masticatory performance and bite force, and the existence of remaining natural occlusal supports as assessed by the Eichner index. One hundred and eighteen removable partial denture and complete denture wearers were selected for analyses. These subjects were divided into four groups depending upon the number of occlusal supports. Seventy dentate subjects with full occlusal support were designated as a comparison group. Bilateral bite force was measured at the first molar region in all subjects. Masticatory performance was assessed using the modified Masticatory Performance Index. Peanuts were used as the test food. Both bite force and masticatory performance were significantly associated with group classification. Moreover, both bite force and masticatory performance of the four denture groups were significantly reduced compared to the comparison group and this tendency was remarkable for the denture groups without occlusal support. These results suggest that the existence of functional tooth units may be a key factor in preservation of masticatory function.
The purpose of this article is to review the literature concerning the ideal chewing pattern for best chewing performance. We conclude that at this time there is not one ideal chewing pattern which can be used clinically or in research to assess the health of the mastication apparatus nor to predict chewing performance. It is clear that human masticatory behaviour is one of the most complex human behaviours. Chewing is under the control of the central pattern generator located in the brain stem but is influenced by dental and temporomandibular joint morphology. The most important portion of the chewing cycle is the area entering and leaving the intercuspal position where gliding contacts occur. Maximal chewing capability will likely occur when the chewing pattern follows the dental anatomy unique to the individual. The chewing cycle appears to increase the lateral component of its movement when increased chewing efficiency is required. These situations include increased hardness or the size of bolus, the position of the bolus and the results of the proceeding chewing stroke. The chewing pattern for any one cycle is influenced by a number of factors, thus it is not surprising that the question of the ideal chewing pattern remains unresolved.
The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between patterns of missing occlusal units (OUs) and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in subjects with the shortened dental arches (SDAs). Subjects with SDAs were recruited consecutively for 1 month from six university-based prosthodontic clinics. In total, 115 SDA subjects participated (mean age, 58.5 +/- 10.0 years; 71% female). The location and number of missing teeth were examined and the number of missing OUs was calculated. To evaluate OHRQoL, the Japanese version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-J) was administered and the summary score of OHIP-J was calculated. The SDA subjects were categorized depending upon the anterior-posterior lengths of the missing or remaining OUs. Regression analyses were performed to investigate the OHIP-J differences between groups of subjects with various anterior-posterior SDA lengths. The analyses revealed that subjects who only lost the second molar contact exhibited significantly better OHRQoL than those who lost more teeth [coefficient: 11.1, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.8-19.2, P = 0.02]. Furthermore a statistically significant group difference was observed between the groups with and without the first molar occlusal contact (coefficient: 12.8, 95% CI: 1.4 to 24.1, P = 0.03). In conclusion, although our results are of exploratory nature and need validation, patterns of missing OUs are likely to be related to the OHRQoL impairment in SDA subjects with the presence of first molar contact having a particularly important role.
Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences in location of the main occluding area with reduction of occlusal support and to evaluate the subsequent impairment in masticatory ability. Methods: One hundred and two patients were recruited according to the Eichner's index, which is based on the number of occlusal support zones. Each subject was instructed to clench a piece of temporary stopping in the particular occluding area that was preferably used during mastication. The main occluding area was judged by locating the tooth on which the temporary stopping rested. Subjective masticatory ability was self-assessed by means of a questionnaire. Results: Group classification depending upon the location of the main occluding area was significantly associated with the category of the Eichner's index. The level of masticatory ability was significantly associated with the category of the Eichner's index. Moreover, masticatory ability was significantly more impaired in subjects with main occluding areas at the premolar regions compared to those at the molar regions. Conclusions: The location of the main occluding area may differ under the influence of the remaining natural teeth. The location of the main occluding area and the masticatory ability are likely to be closely related.
Within the limitations of this study for one racial group, our prediction formula is valid in every LFH range (37 to 59°), and it may also be applicable to patients in whom the LFH deviated greatly from the average.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.