An Evaluation of a Teaching Intervention to Promote Students’ Ability to Use Multiple Levels of Representation When Describing and Explaining Chemical Reactions

Abstract

Students are generally known to memorise and regurgitate chemical equations without sufficient understanding of the changes that occur at the particulate level. In addition, they often fail to recognise the significance of the symbols and formulas that are used to represent chemical reactions. This article describes an evaluation of the ability of 65 Grade 9 students (15-16 years old) from a Singapore secondary school to describe and explain seven types of chemical reactions using macroscopic, submicroscopic and symbolic representations. The study was conducted over nine months using a supplementary teaching program with particular emphasis on the use of multiple levels of representation to describe and explain chemical reactions. Students' proficiency in the use of multiple levels of representation was assessed at the end of the course using a two-tier multiple-choice diagnostic instrument that was previously developed by the authors. In order to evaluate the efficacy of the instructional program, the instrument was also administered to another group of 76 students who were not involved in the supplementary instructional program. The efficacy of the program was evident from the significantly improved scores on the diagnostic instrument of the former group of students. In addition, several student conceptions in the use of multiple levels of representation were identified that could assist teachers in their planning and implementation of classroom instruction.Keywords Chemical reactions . Macroscopic, submicroscopic and symbolic representations . Student conceptions Students' ability to use the macroscopic, submicroscopic and symbolic representations is essential for understanding several chemistry concepts and phenomena. Research has Res Sci Educ (

Avogadro Program for Chemistry Education: To What Extent can Molecular Visualization and Three-dimensional Simulations Enhance Meaningful Chemistry Learning?

“…Chemistry is a difficult subject, since much knowledge in this field concerns the molecular level, and students are expected to think on that scale (in terms of interactions between individual atoms and molecules) to explain phenomena on the macroscopic scale [1,2,3], In addition, they must link the two-dimensional and three-dimensional structures of molecules with their physical properties (such as their physical states, boiling and melting points, density, and color) and their chemical properties (coordination number, chemical stability, and so forth). All these things should be "cooked" into the mind if one is to understand chemistry well.…”

Development ofTwo-TierDiagnostic Test Pictorial-Based for Identifying High School Students Misconceptions on the Mole Concept

“…According to Johnstone, chemistry consists of three levels of representation [3]. Three levels of representation are: (1) the representation of the macroscopic ie representations that describe the bulk properties of the phenomenon and is seen in the daily experience of students, (2) the representation of submicroscopic ie representations that provide explanations on the particulate levels are described as atoms, molecules, or ions , (3) the symbolic representation is the representation that involves the use of chemical symbols, formulas, equations, diagrams, models, and animations [4].…”

Efek Media Demonstrasi Kimia Yang Dimodifikasi Terhadap Pemahaman Mahasiswa Pada Konsep Elektrokimia

“…Kozma dan Russell [4] serta Chandrasegaran [5] menyatakan bahwa representasi submikroskopik merupakan faktor kunci. Hal tersebut memberi arti bahwa ketidak-mampuan dalam merepresentasikan aspek submikroskopik akan menghambat kemampuan yang terkait dengan fenomena tingkat makroskopik dan simbolik.…”