1997
DOI: 10.1080/0144341970170405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Evaluation of a Children's Safety Training Programme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the study by Woods and colleagues (2007) 3 was excluded since the intervention aimed to reduce peer victimization in general and not bullying perpetration or victimization (being bullied). Other reports were excluded from the present review because they were focused on the impact of an anti-bullying program on other outcome measures such as educational attainment (e.g., Fonagy et al 2005), knowledge about and attitudes towards bullying (e.g., Meraviglia et al 2003), or children's safety awareness with regard to different types of potentially unsafe situations, including being bullied (e.g., Warden et al 1997). …”
Section: Criteria For Inclusion or Exclusion Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the study by Woods and colleagues (2007) 3 was excluded since the intervention aimed to reduce peer victimization in general and not bullying perpetration or victimization (being bullied). Other reports were excluded from the present review because they were focused on the impact of an anti-bullying program on other outcome measures such as educational attainment (e.g., Fonagy et al 2005), knowledge about and attitudes towards bullying (e.g., Meraviglia et al 2003), or children's safety awareness with regard to different types of potentially unsafe situations, including being bullied (e.g., Warden et al 1997). …”
Section: Criteria For Inclusion or Exclusion Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to tell someone about an incident has been highlighted as one of the most difficult behaviours to master and one which is consistently reported as being the most difficult item for children to grasp (Tutty, 1993;Warden et al, 1997). The present curriculum provided for the participants has shown that it is possible to teach children to tell someone about an incident and, through talking about a possible rejection, to generalize that skill to telling other people.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Tedisco and Paludi () identified three key themes relating to the rationale behind lures: appeals to authority that exploit the tendency of children to defer authority to adults (Warden, Moran, Gillies, Mayes, & Macleod, ); appeals to empathy exploit the fact that children are usually taught to be kind and to help others (see Newiss, ); and appeals to familiarity describe attempts by the offender to make it seem as though the victim knows or should know them. Although most lures are likely to involve some degree of speech in order to gain compliance, an offender can use nonverbal cues, such as smiling, or actions such as beckoning a child in order to facilitate movement (Wortley & Smallbone, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%