2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.03.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation method to predict progressive collapse resistance of steel frame structures

Abstract: In the current work, a probabilistic assessment method of a steel framed building under abrupt removal of a column due to catastrophic events is developed. A multi-storey steel framed model taking into account the influence of catenary effect has been analyzed. Uncertainties in the structural variables are incorporated in the probabilistic simulation approach. Based on the changes of component internal energy, the progressive collapse sensitivity to abrupt removal of a column has been investigated. Besides, a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The actual structure is three-dimensional and spatial effects are not considered, and the existing analysis methods present some invalidity in the face of the multiple directions of external effects, the uncertainty of susceptibility and the randomness of the influencing factors [ 31 ], which cannot reproduce the complex working behavior and damage mechanisms of the joint structure. Moreover, due to the lack of theoretical concepts and the incompetence of technical methods, the large amount of strain data from the test that is not easily accessible is not sufficiently valued, which leads to the failure of this part of the data to give deep analysis [ 32 , 33 ], where new research tools have been needed to reveal the unseen effects of changes in the structural response on the evolution of the joint failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The actual structure is three-dimensional and spatial effects are not considered, and the existing analysis methods present some invalidity in the face of the multiple directions of external effects, the uncertainty of susceptibility and the randomness of the influencing factors [ 31 ], which cannot reproduce the complex working behavior and damage mechanisms of the joint structure. Moreover, due to the lack of theoretical concepts and the incompetence of technical methods, the large amount of strain data from the test that is not easily accessible is not sufficiently valued, which leads to the failure of this part of the data to give deep analysis [ 32 , 33 ], where new research tools have been needed to reveal the unseen effects of changes in the structural response on the evolution of the joint failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, there has been significant interest relating to the resistance of steel structures to progressive collapse under accidental loads such as seismic action [1,2], blast [2][3][4][5] and fire [2,6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The negative effect of the missing component is simulated by the so-called conceptual removal method. A component is removed from the structure every time, and the mechanical behavior of the residual structure is analyzed to evaluate any negative effect [ 15 ]. A greater importance coefficient implies a higher possibility of collapse risk, meaning the damage or failure of this component is more likely to cause a progressive collapse of the structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%