2017 IEEE Visual Communications and Image Processing (VCIP) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/vcip.2017.8305084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation framework for 360-degree video compression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other researches on 360 • video and image have focused on the coding performance that use head-mounted displays (HMD) to perform the subjective test [5], [6], [25]. However, the HMD does not support the new projection formats.…”
Section: B Subjective Test Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other researches on 360 • video and image have focused on the coding performance that use head-mounted displays (HMD) to perform the subjective test [5], [6], [25]. However, the HMD does not support the new projection formats.…”
Section: B Subjective Test Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most 360 • image services, the two-dimensional (2D) image is generated by unfolding the pixel information from the spherical space of the 360 • image to the 2D plane [6]- [8]. This operation is called projection and the main reason for this is to use already existing high efficient 2D image coding techniques because no efficient encoding techniques have been developed for the images represented in the spherical space so far.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sun et al [9] proposed the weighted-tospherically-uniform PSNR (WS-PSNR) metric, which uses all samples on the original projection plane and considers the weights according to the corresponding specific point positions on the spherical surface, but WS-PSNR cannot assess quality of omnidirectional video across different projection formats. Similarly, an area weighted spherical PSNR (AW-SPSNR) [10] is proposed, which can utilize all available samples in the projected 2D plane and does not rely on interpolation. In [16], a Voronoi-based objective quality model is proposed for omnidirectional video quality evaluation, in which the interactive look around nature and the spherical representation characteristic are taken into account.…”
Section: A Objective Vqa For Omnidirectional Videomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For objective VQA on omnidirectional video, there have been several approaches [35,38,41,45,49,50] that advance the metric of PSNR by considering the sample density of the map projection in omnidirectional video. Some applied weight allocation in the calculation of PSNR, e.g, weighted-to-spherically-uniform PSNR (WS-PSNR) [35] and area weighted spherical PSNR (AW-SPSNR) [45]; others resampled the content into a point-uniformed projection, e.g., S-PSNR [49] and PSNR in Craster parabolic projection (CPP-PSNR) [50]. In [38,41], the performance of the above objective VQA approaches was compared by measuring their correlation with the subjective quality scores.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is necessary to study on visual quality assessment (VQA) for omnidirectional video. Most recently, several subjective VQA approaches [20,28,30,31,39,40,47,51] and objective VQA approaches [35,38,41,45,49,50] have been proposed for either omnidirectional image or video. Among these approaches, the impact of some factors on the quality of omnidirectional video were studied, such as display types, coding schemes and sample uniformity under different map projections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%