2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtv.2021.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An estimation of diabetes foot self-care based on validated scores: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Continuing care takes personalized nursing measures to cultivate their independent ability by strengthening the maintenance of the relationship between medical staff and patients and the integration of medical services [24]. Learn self-care and self-care in daily life, enhance their self-confidence to maximize their physical and mental state, reduce dependence on family members and excessive use of medical resources, and the quality of life will also improve [26][27][28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuing care takes personalized nursing measures to cultivate their independent ability by strengthening the maintenance of the relationship between medical staff and patients and the integration of medical services [24]. Learn self-care and self-care in daily life, enhance their self-confidence to maximize their physical and mental state, reduce dependence on family members and excessive use of medical resources, and the quality of life will also improve [26][27][28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is echoed in a recent systematic review and meta‐analysis of eight studies and 2493 PwD, which found over half (62.8%) of participants achieved a moderate diabetic FSC score. 20 This is comparable with studies from countries with similar socioeconomic and cultural characteristics, including Oman, Sudan, and Ethiopia. 8 , 9 , 30 , 31 , 32 In contrast, a recent study from Jordan reported relatively high levels of adherence to FSC practices (~73%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Multiple linear regression was used to examine the independent association of routinely available demographic and diabetes‐related variables known to influence diabetes self care (age category, gender, education level, marital status, employment status, monthly household income, diabetes type, insulin therapy, diabetes duration, diabetes education, and attending a diabetes education program) with the FSC score. Statistical significance was determined if type I error rate was <5% ( p < 0.05) 8,9,20,21 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Globally, it appears that the previous research on foot self-care only targeted the general population of diabetes not the specific population of high-risk foot. 16 Similarly, in Jordan the present data on foot self-care among people with diabetes-related high-risk foot is insufficient. Although 2 previous large cross-sectional studies showed poor foot self-care in people with diabetes in Jordan, 17 , 18 the data represent the overall population of diabetes including people with low-risk feet while, as mentioned, people with diabetes-related high-risk feet need much more attention to reduce the high risk and hopefully preventing DFUs and the related amputations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%