1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(97)70051-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An estimation of craniofacial growth in the untreated Class III female with anterior crossbite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
2
9

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
37
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…All the three parameters were significantly lower in both groups compared to the control group, while they were the lowest in the patients with divergent type of mandibular prognathism. Similar results for skeletal Class III were found by Miyajima et al 26 , Guyer et al 11 , Reyes et al 13 and Chang et al 25 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…All the three parameters were significantly lower in both groups compared to the control group, while they were the lowest in the patients with divergent type of mandibular prognathism. Similar results for skeletal Class III were found by Miyajima et al 26 , Guyer et al 11 , Reyes et al 13 and Chang et al 25 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In the present systematic review, we considered confounders, all those factors that were possibly related to the chin-cup therapy and could cause significant changes in the results. Ethnicity was needed to be taken into account, as Class III malocclusion is more frequently seen in Asian populations [1, 7, 14-16] and consequently these patients may be more often treated with chin-cups. Moreover, patients of Asian ancestry may present different baseline characteristics, as well as a different growth pattern than other populations, thus significantly affecting the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the following confounders were taken into account both for patients and controls: ethnicity (as Asian populations have a higher prevalence of Class III malocclusion) [1, 7,14-16], age in relation to the skeletal maturity stage, pre-treatment skeletal Class of malocclusion (when it was not skeletal Class III both for patients and controls), soft-tissue profile individual variation in thickness and in tension, and pre-treatment overjet. Moreover, co-interventions were considered the use of additional appliances, such as an occlusal bite plate, a quad-helix appliance, a lingual arch, etc., and the utilization of force magnitude of the chin-cup traction.…”
Section: Materials and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bu nedenle maloklüzyonlarla ilişkili olarak, kraniyofasiyal komponentlerin değerlendirilmesindeki en önemli basamaklardan biri de, cinsiyetle ilişkili morfolojik farklılıkların dikkate alınmasıdır. Sınıf III maloklüzyonlar üzerinde yapılmış olan çalışmalarda, grup oluşturulmasındaki güçlükler sebebiyle, nadiren kraniyofasiyal öl-çümler cinsiyetlerle ilişkili olarak değerlendi-rilmeye çalışılmış (2,20,21) , ya da çalışma-lar tek bir cins üzerinde yürütülmüştür (17,22,23). Cinsiyet farklılıklarına değinen bu çalış-maların bir kısmı büyüme ve gelişimin spesifik dönemlerine ait bilgiler verirken (22,23), az sayıda çalışmada büyüme ve gelişimle görülen değişiklikler de değerlendirmiştir (2,17,20,21).…”
Section: Gđrđşunclassified