2002
DOI: 10.1109/7693.994822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An error-protected speech recognition system for wireless communications

Abstract: uture wireless multimedia terminals will have a variety of applications that require speech recognition capabilities.In this paper, we consider a robust distributed speech recognition system where representative parameters of the speech signal are extracted at the wireless terminal and transmitted to a centralized automatic speech recognition (ASR) server. We propose several unequal error protection schemes for the ASR bit stream and demonstrate the satisfactory performance of these schemes for typical wireles… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Transmission over error-prone transport channels will typically result in some packets being lost. To mitigate the effect of these losses, frame concealment techniques, such as insertion, interpolation and regeneration (Milner and Semnani, 2000;Mayorga et al, 2002) and unequal forward error correction techniques (Weerackody et al, 2002;Riskin et al, 2001) can be used. Now it is required that each packet be independently decodable.…”
Section: Packetizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Transmission over error-prone transport channels will typically result in some packets being lost. To mitigate the effect of these losses, frame concealment techniques, such as insertion, interpolation and regeneration (Milner and Semnani, 2000;Mayorga et al, 2002) and unequal forward error correction techniques (Weerackody et al, 2002;Riskin et al, 2001) can be used. Now it is required that each packet be independently decodable.…”
Section: Packetizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Separate prediction loops are maintained for the base and each of the enhancement layers. The proposed scalable encoding technique offers several advantages: (i) it provides multiple layers, where the enhancement layer data refines the base layer data to provide higher fidelity representation, (ii) the rate of each layer can be easily modified, and (iii) it provides flexibility for using unequal error protection schemes (Weerackody et al, 2002) to ensure adequate protection for the bitstream. This is especially useful in mobile channels where the channel conditions are constantly changing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Convolutional codes also provide added flexibility to adjust the final protection Performance of media-independent FEC codes, with respect to the level of redundancy inserted, can be enhanced by providing for each bit in the bitstream the adequate level of protection against channel errors. The bits comprising the transmitted datastream of DSR systems do not have equal effect on the word recognition performance of the overall system Weerackody et al 2002). For example, in the case of scalar quantization of extracted speech features, the most significant bits (MSBs) generally provide more information for the recognizer than the least significant bits (LSBs).…”
Section: Convolutional Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, transmitting VQ data over packet networks may experience packet loss and consequently leads to degraded recognition performance. There has been much interest in the use of packet-level forward error correction (FEC) to compensate for packet loss, based on parity codes and Reed-Solomon codes [2] [3]. All of the FEC mechanisms send some redundant information which is based on previously transmitted packets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By insertion of the optimal reproduction vector as in(2) and, due to the mutual independence of the erasure channels,…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%