2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2010.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An error control approach to tool path adjustment conforming to the deformation of thin-walled workpiece

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The non-real-time compensation approach is more time-consuming on one hand but more practical on the other hand, compared with the real-time approach, because off-process measurement is much easier to carry out. The feedback strategy of the on-machine measurement results in the compensation machining being more flexible, which can be carried out by 1) editing the program of the machine NC to generate a compensation tool path [8][10] [225], 2) changing the NC offset [184] [233] and/or moving the workpiece [148] to adjust its position or orientation in the machining space, 3) modifying the tool setting to displace the cutting point of the tool path [184], or 4) adding a tool positioning system, such as a fast too servo, to control the depth-of-cut [61]. Mirror radial position mm Fig.…”
Section: Feedback To Compensation Machiningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The non-real-time compensation approach is more time-consuming on one hand but more practical on the other hand, compared with the real-time approach, because off-process measurement is much easier to carry out. The feedback strategy of the on-machine measurement results in the compensation machining being more flexible, which can be carried out by 1) editing the program of the machine NC to generate a compensation tool path [8][10] [225], 2) changing the NC offset [184] [233] and/or moving the workpiece [148] to adjust its position or orientation in the machining space, 3) modifying the tool setting to displace the cutting point of the tool path [184], or 4) adding a tool positioning system, such as a fast too servo, to control the depth-of-cut [61]. Mirror radial position mm Fig.…”
Section: Feedback To Compensation Machiningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rashev et al [96] included artificial neural network to the CAM to improve the accuracy of the predicted deflection. Wan et al [97] used deformation simulations to predict the optimum position of the support, evaluating the relative workpiece–part position.…”
Section: Industrial Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of cutting forces induced machining errors is most severe in the situation of Flank milling on thin walls. Habibi et al [41] and Wan et al [42] provided the compensation solutions for, and the prediction of the form errors, from cutter and thin wall elastic deformation. Kang and Wang [43] also addressed the same cutter-thin wall elastic deformation problem, but only worked out the deformation prediction without offering the compensation solution.…”
Section: Prediction Of Process-dependent Machining Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%