2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An ER-fMRI study of Russian inflectional morphology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
25
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
4
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence from priming experiments (Kazanina, Dukova-Zheleva, Geber, Kharlamov, & Tonciulescu, 2008 ), for example, indicates that L1 speakers of Russian decompose diminutive forms into their morphological constituents during word recognition; see Clahsen, Sonnenstuhl, and Blevins ( 2003 ) for parallel results on L1 German. For infl ectional morphology in L1 Russian, Slioussar et al (2014) reported a brain-imaging experiment showing the familiar contrasts between regular and irregular infl ection that have been obtained in comparable studies on German (Beretta et al, 2003 ) and other languages. These studies indicate that it is not the case that speakers of Russian rely less on morphology and morphosyntax for word recognition in their L1 than do German speakers in their L1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Evidence from priming experiments (Kazanina, Dukova-Zheleva, Geber, Kharlamov, & Tonciulescu, 2008 ), for example, indicates that L1 speakers of Russian decompose diminutive forms into their morphological constituents during word recognition; see Clahsen, Sonnenstuhl, and Blevins ( 2003 ) for parallel results on L1 German. For infl ectional morphology in L1 Russian, Slioussar et al (2014) reported a brain-imaging experiment showing the familiar contrasts between regular and irregular infl ection that have been obtained in comparable studies on German (Beretta et al, 2003 ) and other languages. These studies indicate that it is not the case that speakers of Russian rely less on morphology and morphosyntax for word recognition in their L1 than do German speakers in their L1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The involvement of these brain areas is believed to be related to the necessity of the greater behavioral control during deception as compared to that for truthful actions (see, e.g., [5,7]). However, the functional specializa tion of the structures indicated according to literature indicates the possibility of their involvement in provid ing activities not necessarily connected with decep tion, e.g., speech [8], attention [9], and executive con trol [10]. Thus, the changes in the functional activity observed might be connected with global effects related to the relative difficulty of the activity imple mented rather than to the deception as such.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…It was proven that density and quality of neural network and glias increased as a result of education, dendrites and axons providing the growth and modification of intracerebral connections; even the size of nerve fibers increases (due to intensive myelinization) (Zuk et al, 2014). That is, education is a direct impact on brain tissue (Alekseev et al, 2015;Chernigovskaya, 2010;Slioussar et al, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This discipline is interdisciplinary and involves usage of results obtained within other neurosciences. Since according to the modern research (Macajova, 2013) in the progress of education, the brain changes physically (Chernigovskaya, 2010;Slioussar et al, 2014;Zuk et al, 2014) and the very education is permanent and not always purposeful, it is important what information and which way the human being obtains it. It is a determining factor in understanding hybridization of neuropedagogy and knowledge management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%