2012
DOI: 10.3390/en5082724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Equivalent Electrical Circuit Model of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells Based on Mathematical Modelling

Abstract: Many of the Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell (PEMFC) models proposed in the literature consist of mathematical equations. However, they are not adequately practical for simulating power systems. The proposed model takes into account phenomena such as activation polarization, ohmic polarization, double layer capacitance and mass transport effects present in a PEM fuel cell. Using electrical analogies and a mathematical modeling of PEMFC, the circuit model is established. To evaluate the effectiveness of the c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) takes a proton exchange membrane (PEM, also known as polymer electrolyte membrane) as electrolyte and represents the most common type of fuel cells. It's more and more widely used because of its capability in low temperature operation, high power density, relatively high efficiency and zero/low emission [1][2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) takes a proton exchange membrane (PEM, also known as polymer electrolyte membrane) as electrolyte and represents the most common type of fuel cells. It's more and more widely used because of its capability in low temperature operation, high power density, relatively high efficiency and zero/low emission [1][2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The validation strategies are variable too, as some authors validate their models thank to experimentations [33,36], some others thanks to comparison done with other publication [39], or even with equations solver results [32]. Lee et al [24] validate their model by evaluating the fitting of their curve with the real data, it means that it is the evaluation of the parameters and the shape of the model that are validated on the example not its predictive ability.…”
Section: Validation Of the Modelsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A model for comprehensive purpose is a model which aims understanding the interaction between different electrochemical mechanisms. The claimed objectives are variables: Fouquet et al [23] developed their model for diagnostic purpose, while Siegel et al [27] objective is comprehension whereas for Hinaje et al [32] it is a development that would allow the control. In other references, the underlying aim is not always given, even if it is a capital fact, as a model developed for purpose of design [33] won't fit most of the time for another application.…”
Section: Aims Of the Modelsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Devices of this kind are already on the market, but their real success can only reward systems improved as regards costs, durability and efficiency, which require extensive research and development in materials and technology that can greatly benefit from accurate numerical modeling, simulation and optimization. Several PEMFC models are reported in the literature which take into account the fundamental physical phenomena [14,15,16,17,18], while a smaller number has been presented for describing PEMELs, mostly based on empirical relations [19]. Instead, the literature lacks unified physical models incorporating both charge and discharge functions.…”
Section: Regenerative Fuel Cellsmentioning
confidence: 98%