1995
DOI: 10.1016/0304-4017(94)00694-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An epidemiological study of Cryptosporidium parvum in two herds of adult beef cattle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
34
1
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
34
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, there is a wide range of reported prevalences of fecal shedding of C. parvum for adult beef and dairy cattle. Numerous investigators have reported mean prevalences of fecal shedding from ϳ20 to ϳ70% in groups of clinically healthy adult cattle (23,31,34), yet several large cross-sectional epidemiologic surveys have observed prevalences of only 2% or less in asymptomatic adult cattle populations (4, 20, 41). Some of this variation in the observed prevalence of fecal shedding can be explained by different investigators using diagnostic assays of differing sensitivity and specificity (11,13,15), but much of the variation is the result of studying different populations of cattle (e.g., beef versus dairy), different age distributions within those populations, and groups of cattle under different management practices, especially when only a single farm or a small sample is examined.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, there is a wide range of reported prevalences of fecal shedding of C. parvum for adult beef and dairy cattle. Numerous investigators have reported mean prevalences of fecal shedding from ϳ20 to ϳ70% in groups of clinically healthy adult cattle (23,31,34), yet several large cross-sectional epidemiologic surveys have observed prevalences of only 2% or less in asymptomatic adult cattle populations (4, 20, 41). Some of this variation in the observed prevalence of fecal shedding can be explained by different investigators using diagnostic assays of differing sensitivity and specificity (11,13,15), but much of the variation is the result of studying different populations of cattle (e.g., beef versus dairy), different age distributions within those populations, and groups of cattle under different management practices, especially when only a single farm or a small sample is examined.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent estimates have ranged from 70 to 900 oocysts g of feces Ϫ1 for infected noncalf populations (13,16,19,34), but these values are highly conditional on the underlying age distribution of the population (16,39,41,44) and the sensitivity of the diagnostic test being employed (11,15,19,21,42,43). Increasing the sensitivity of an assay will function to increasingly detect individuals shedding at low intensities, thereby lowering the overall estimated mean intensity of shedding for the infected cohort of a population.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cryptosporidium parvum is also the most widespread enteropathogen identified in neonatal calves. Ninety percent of American dairy farms harbor this coccidian, and 92% of asymptomatic adult cows have specific anti-C. parvum IgG, IgG1, IgG2, and IgM antibodies (1). Neonatal calves experience high morbidity, but low mortality with monoinfections, although mixed infections result in a much greater rate of mortality (2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The host specificity of Cryptosporidium spp. is broad: it infects a wide range of animals, as well as humans (Nime et al, 1976;Hering et al, 1989;Moore & Zeman, 1991;Lindsay et al, 1991;Ditrich et al, 1991;Scott et al, 1994;Krause étal, 1995;Scott et al, 1995). However it is questio nable whether the Cryptosporidium strains commonly found in animals are the same as those infecting humans.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%