1989
DOI: 10.1001/jama.1989.03430220066032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Epidemiologic Study of Contraception and Preeclampsia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
76
0
2

Year Published

1989
1989
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
76
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Human studies show that both acute exposure to semen at the beginning of a pregnancy, as well as cumulative exposure over time, can protect against recurrent miscarriage and preeclampsia, in a partner specific manner [101]. Studies have also shown that semen exposure in women is advantageous to pregnancy outcome, the use of barrier contraception methods and the period of cohabitation between couples suggests that chronic semen exposure by an individual can be beneficial to subsequent pregnancies [102].…”
Section: Seminal Plasma and Pathologies Of Pregnancymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human studies show that both acute exposure to semen at the beginning of a pregnancy, as well as cumulative exposure over time, can protect against recurrent miscarriage and preeclampsia, in a partner specific manner [101]. Studies have also shown that semen exposure in women is advantageous to pregnancy outcome, the use of barrier contraception methods and the period of cohabitation between couples suggests that chronic semen exposure by an individual can be beneficial to subsequent pregnancies [102].…”
Section: Seminal Plasma and Pathologies Of Pregnancymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 This concept is also supported by the observations that the risk is reduced when there is a longer period of intercourse with the father before conception 11 and that barrier contraceptives that prevent exposure to semen increase the risk of preeclampsia. 12 Different diagnostic criteria and poor record keeping make it virtually impossible to compare the frequency of preeclampsia in different populations from routinely collected data. It is clear that death rates from the disorder are more common in developing countries; however, this need not indicate increased disease frequency.…”
Section: Epidemiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pregnancies with large placentas (as in twin pregnancies, diabetic pregnancies and hydatidiform moles), primigravidas, and a previous pregnancy with preeclampsia (16), increase the risk of developing preeclampsia. A new sexual partner and the use of barrier contraception are both associated with an increased risk of developing preeclampsia, whereas previous antigen exposure is protective (17). There are also reports of family clustering of preeclampsia (18;19), although no general, world wide genetic explanation has been confirmed.…”
Section: Risk Factors For Preeclampsiamentioning
confidence: 99%