2019
DOI: 10.1080/13215906.2019.1624190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An enterprise risk management system for SMEs: innovative design paradigm and risk representation model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings show that ERM literature can be divided into four general lines of research: ERM adoption, determinants of ERM implementation, the effects of ERM adoption, and other aspects. The first strand offers information about risk management practices (Altuntas et al 2011;Almeida et al 2019;Bensaada and Taghezout 2019;Beck da Silva Etges et al 2019;Mishra et al 2019). It can be inferred that there is a growing interest of researchers regarding ERM in SMEs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings show that ERM literature can be divided into four general lines of research: ERM adoption, determinants of ERM implementation, the effects of ERM adoption, and other aspects. The first strand offers information about risk management practices (Altuntas et al 2011;Almeida et al 2019;Bensaada and Taghezout 2019;Beck da Silva Etges et al 2019;Mishra et al 2019). It can be inferred that there is a growing interest of researchers regarding ERM in SMEs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PCA summarizes and reduces the size of the 42 independent variables into a number of underlying factors and structure, which determine the variability of financial inclusion for SMEs in Egypt. In keeping up with the literature (notably [ 1 , 8 , 10 , 13 ]), the ‘eigenvalue-based criteria,’ 4 provided the cut-off threshold for the number of components or groups explaining the variability of the dependent variable. There is a standardized cut-off point agreed upon by the literature, which should exceed 50% or equivalent to a number of PC groups that retain a coefficient of variability that almost reaches one [ 29 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it was inevitable for the researchers to reduce the number of variables through the principal component analysis (PCA). The PCA is an inferential analysis method used to summarize the number of variables determining in this case SMEs’ level of financial inclusion, and its use is aligned with the previous literature using the same approach, as in the case of Tomaselli et al [ 59 ], ElSherif [ 21 ], Bensaada and Taghezout [ 10 ] and Cámara and Tuesta [ 13 ] to estimate the level of financial inclusion. After the PCA, a logistic regression with categorical variables was conducted to provide the best fit to a linear regression model on the factors causing the highest possible variability on the level of financial inclusion (as proposed by Archer et al [ 4 ]).…”
Section: Methodological Approach: Twofold Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On another side, the lack of best practice examples could affect the organization's willingness. Opportunity implementation exists in some literature and article related to project management [5]- [9], enterprise management systems [10], and good example implementation in TAMCO [11]. On the contrary, many implementations only see one side of handling risk in quality, occupational health, and environmental management systems [12] [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%