2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10064-019-01700-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An enhanced index for evaluating natural joint roughness considering multiple morphological factors affecting the shear behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They discovered that the lowest peak strength and elastic modulus were observed at an inclination angle of approximately 45°. ; Ma et al, (2020) and Song et al, (2019) identified the inclination angle of rock joints as a crucial indicator for evaluating shear behavior. They found a positive correlation between the shear strength of rock joints and the inclination angle of the joint surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They discovered that the lowest peak strength and elastic modulus were observed at an inclination angle of approximately 45°. ; Ma et al, (2020) and Song et al, (2019) identified the inclination angle of rock joints as a crucial indicator for evaluating shear behavior. They found a positive correlation between the shear strength of rock joints and the inclination angle of the joint surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two methods to describe the surface morphological characteristics of joint, namely, 2D parameter description and 3D parameter description (Ge et al 2012;Song et al 2020;Du et al 2022). 2D parameter description method usually selects multiple cross-sections on the surface of joint, and uses the 2D parameters average value of multiple cross-sections to represent the whole joint surface characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the fact that the surface of real joint is three-dimensional, some characteristic points of joint will be missed when using the 2D parameter method to evaluate its morphological characteristics, which will lead to incomplete description of joint surface characteristics. To solve this problem, some scholars have put forward 3D roughness algorithms which consider the 3D morphological characteristics of joints (Ge et al 2012;Song et al 2020;Belem et al 2000;Grasselli et al 2002;Cai Y et al 2018;Tatone & Grasselli. 2009;Chen et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation