2009
DOI: 10.1109/tcsi.2009.2016125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Energy-Detector for Noncoherent Impulse-Radio UWB Receivers

Abstract: This study proposes an energy detector for a noncoherent impulse-radio UWB receiver, designed in a 0.18-mum CMOS technology. The squaring functionality is realized exploiting the quadratic characteristic of MOS transistors, and the deviation from such a characteristic due to short channel effects and device mismatch is carefully considered in the paper. The squared signal is integrated using a Gm-C integrator that is interfaced with the squarer using a flipped voltage follower current sensor as a current to vo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The receiver power ( ), the transmitter power ( ) and the total power ( ) can be given as below (21) Thus, the ratio of the to can be given utilizing (20) and (21) as below, after simplification (i.e., after canceling the term from both the numerator and denominator) (22) As can be seen from (22) for low data rate applications (i.e., ), the impulse radio with its duty-cycled receiver and transmitter will facilitate lower power consumption for a link of given path loss. The same analysis can be done even including the overhead and leakage power, in which the equation for the relative ratio will change to (23) (23) Again, it can be easily seen that the continuous wave radio consumes higher power than the impulse radio, as . Fig.…”
Section: Comparison Between Duty-cycled Impulse and Cw Radiosmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The receiver power ( ), the transmitter power ( ) and the total power ( ) can be given as below (21) Thus, the ratio of the to can be given utilizing (20) and (21) as below, after simplification (i.e., after canceling the term from both the numerator and denominator) (22) As can be seen from (22) for low data rate applications (i.e., ), the impulse radio with its duty-cycled receiver and transmitter will facilitate lower power consumption for a link of given path loss. The same analysis can be done even including the overhead and leakage power, in which the equation for the relative ratio will change to (23) (23) Again, it can be easily seen that the continuous wave radio consumes higher power than the impulse radio, as . Fig.…”
Section: Comparison Between Duty-cycled Impulse and Cw Radiosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Impulse radio as an extreme case of these duty-cycled architectures is expected to facilitate ultra low power communication, since the power hungry RF-block need only be on during transmission and reception of short-duration pulses. Impulse radio communication is also interesting since it operates in unlicensed spectrum, and is less sensitive to carrier frequency variations [21]- [23]. However, compared to narrowband architectures, wideband impulse radios have wider bandwidth (requiring higher power) and higher susceptibility to noise.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the signal is strong enough receivers can be noncoherent, which are usually simpler but more susceptible to noise. Most non-coherent topologies are based on squaring and then integrating the signal [29,[35][36][37][38][39][40], however other techniques using comparison [41] or super-regeneration [42][43][44] have been proposed. In this special session a hybrid method, combining both coherent and non-coherent methods, is presented in "Partially Coherent Signal Combination for Impulse Radio Synchronization".…”
Section: Receiversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also an advantage of the impulse radio receiver that it can work with a low-resolution A/D converter. The impulse radio transceiver development has been considered mainly in the low-frequency ultrawideband systems (below 10.6 GHz), e.g., [4], [5] and references therein. However, thanks to the progress of semiconductor technology, development of the impulse radio transceiver has also been performed in the mmwave range [6], [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%