An Energy-Aware Trust and Opportunity Based Routing Algorithm in Wireless Sensor Networks Using Multipath Routes Technique

Hajiee, Maryam; Fartash, Mehdi; Eraghi, Naiseh Osati

doi:10.1007/s11063-021-10525-7

Cited by 32 publications

(47 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Hajiee [22] presented the ETOR to select adequate route. The main processes included in the ETOR are selection of secure nodes and opportunistic node selection for performing the routing in WSN.…”

Section: Literature Surveymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The performance of the SCRIMFO method is analyzed in terms of AEC, PDR, PLR and routing load. The SRPMA [16], ACCA [21] and ETOR [22] are used to analyse the SCRIMFO method. The comparison of AEC for the SRPMA [16] and SCRIMFO is shown in Table 2 and Fig.…”

Section: Performance Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…3 shows the PDR comparison between the SRPMA [16] and SCRIMFO method. Moreover, the Table 3 shows the PDR comparison between the SRPMA [16], ACCA [21], ETOR [22] and SCRIMFO method. From the PDR analysis, it is determined that the SCRIMFO method obtains huge PDR than the SRPMA [16], ACCA [21] and ETOR [22].…”

Section: Packet Delivery Ratiomentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Moreover, the Table 3 shows the PDR comparison between the SRPMA [16], ACCA [21], ETOR [22] and SCRIMFO method. From the PDR analysis, it is determined that the SCRIMFO method obtains huge PDR than the SRPMA [16], ACCA [21] and ETOR [22]. For example, the SCRIMFO achieves a PDR of 94.64 % for 2 DDoS attacks, which is high when compared to the SRPMA [16], ACCA [21] and ETOR [22].…”

Section: Packet Delivery Ratiomentioning

confidence: 99%

“…From the PDR analysis, it is determined that the SCRIMFO method obtains huge PDR than the SRPMA [16], ACCA [21] and ETOR [22]. For example, the SCRIMFO achieves a PDR of 94.64 % for 2 DDoS attacks, which is high when compared to the SRPMA [16], ACCA [21] and ETOR [22]. The secure routing path identification using the SCRIMFO is led to improve the packet delivery.…”

Section: Packet Delivery Ratiomentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Secure Cluster based Routing Using Improved Moth Flame Optimization for Wireless Sensor Networks

2022

IJIES

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) is developed as a promising technology for a wide range of applications due to its low installation cost. However, the nodes in the WSN are susceptible to different security threats, because these nodes are located in hostile or harsh environments. The important goal of this paper is to obtain secure data transmission while minimizing energy consumption. In this paper, an Improved Moth Flame Optimization (IMFO) is used for selecting the optimal Cluster Head (CH) from the network. Moreover, the secure routing path is generated using the IMFO where the fitness function considers residual energy, distance, trust and node degree. Therefore, the Secure Clustering and Routing using IMFO (SCRIMFO) provides the resistance against the Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) attack whereas the energy consumption is minimized by identifying the shortest path. The proposed SCRIMFO method is analysed in terms of Average Energy Consumption (AEC), Packet Loss Ratio (PLR), Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR) and routing load. Here, the SCRIMFO method is compared with the Secure Routing Protocol based on Multi-objective Ant-colony-optimization (SRPMA), Ant Colony Conveyance Algorithm (ACCA) and Energy-aware Trust and Opportunity-based Routing (ETOR) approaches. The PDR of the SCRIMFO is 94.64 % for 2 DDoS attacks that is high when compared to the SRPMA, ACCA and ETOR.

show abstract

Section: Literature Surveymentioning

confidence: 99%