2014
DOI: 10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n20p485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Employee Engagement Instrument and Framework Building on Existing Research

Abstract: Employee engagement is important as it contributes to an organisation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The benefits of being engaged started from positive emotional outcomes to improving individual and organizational performance. It is also found that disengaged employees negatively affect their co-workers' engagement, and that work disengagement is costing organizations large sums of money due to lack of interest of employees several aspects such as quality product or service and customer satisfaction (e. g., Nienaber & Martins, 2014;Bhatnagar, 2012;Jeung, 2011;Saks, 2006).…”
Section: Work Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefits of being engaged started from positive emotional outcomes to improving individual and organizational performance. It is also found that disengaged employees negatively affect their co-workers' engagement, and that work disengagement is costing organizations large sums of money due to lack of interest of employees several aspects such as quality product or service and customer satisfaction (e. g., Nienaber & Martins, 2014;Bhatnagar, 2012;Jeung, 2011;Saks, 2006).…”
Section: Work Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gran cantidad de autores coinciden en señalar inconsistencias tanto en las diferentes defi niciones del concepto como en los instrumentos desarrollados para su medición (e.g. Christian, Garza, & Slaughter, 2011;Hirschfeld & Thomas, 2008;Jeung, 2011;Macey & Schneider, 2008;Masson, Royal, Agnew, & Fine, 2008;Nienaber & Martins, 2014;Robertson & Cooper, 2010;Rothbard & Patil, 2012;Schaufeli & Salanova, 2011;Viljevac, Cooper-Thomas, & Saks, 2012). Tal variedad de defi niciones redunda en estudios cuyos resultados no son pasibles de comparación y generalización ( Nienaber & Martins, 2014;Vilijevak et al, 2012).…”
unclassified
“…The definition of work engagement has been much discussed in the field of positive organizational psychology (Bakker et al, 2008). Several researchers highlight inconsistencies both in the different definitions of the concept and in the instruments developed for its measurement (Hirschfeld & Thomas, 2008;Jeung, 2011;Macey & Schneider, 2008;Nienaber & Martins, 2014).…”
Section: Introduction 11 Evidence Of Content and Internal Structure O...mentioning
confidence: 99%