2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1047-8310(03)00003-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An empirical test of environmental, organizational, and process factors affecting incremental and radical innovation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
183
1
10

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 284 publications
(209 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
7
183
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…However, only firms that combine their internal knowledge base with knowledge from external sources can obtain a positive impact on radical innovation performance. The study also confirms that large incumbents within the industry favour exploiting existing technologies through incremental innovation performance (Koberg et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, only firms that combine their internal knowledge base with knowledge from external sources can obtain a positive impact on radical innovation performance. The study also confirms that large incumbents within the industry favour exploiting existing technologies through incremental innovation performance (Koberg et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Specifically, they confirm that although organizational size positively affects internal knowledge creation capability, size has no impact on absorptive capability. Furthermore, the results show that larger firms enjoy greater advantages for incremental innovation performance (Koberg et al, 2003) but not for radical innovation performance on which large firm size has a negative non-significant effect (Abernathy and Utterback, 1978). These results corroborate those by Ettlie et al (1984).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…34 Koberg et al found that environmental dynamism positively affects both incremental and radical innovations, although the effect is more positive for radical innovations. 35 In a study of the financial services sector, Jansen et al conclude that exploratory innovation is more effective in dynamic environments. 36 Andrews used both objective and subjective measures of environmental dynamism and reported that both measures were negatively related to achievements in public organizations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the researches of coupling degree measurement are mainly classified into the following 3 types. First, many foreign scholars' researches are mainly from these aspects, the matching of functions [3] (Ensign,2001) 、 Collaborative mechanism [4] ( Koberg,2003), and so on. These studies are mainly through qualitative methods proposed on measuring the degree of collaboration, these methods are subjective measures and they are susceptible to be influenced by measuring person's personal understanding.…”
Section: Literature Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%