1992
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0167.39.2.193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An empirical test of a model of nontraditional student adjustment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
62
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(30 reference statements)
6
62
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is consistent with previous research (Chartrand, 1992;Metzner et al, 2003). The two variables which play a similar role in students' intention to continue are expectancy and value perceptions.…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding is consistent with previous research (Chartrand, 1992;Metzner et al, 2003). The two variables which play a similar role in students' intention to continue are expectancy and value perceptions.…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
“…The two variables which play a similar role in students' intention to continue are expectancy and value perceptions. Again this is consistent with previous research (Chartrand, 1992;Karpanty, 1998;Torres & Solberg, 2001). This impact of motivational variables on persistence really calls into question the pertinence of models such as Tinto's which do not consider these variables.…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
“…Unlike Bean, Spady and Tinto also emphasize the role of social integration and academic integration in determining institutional commitment. Empirical evaluations of these theoretical models have found varying levels of support with some finding support for the role of adjustment variables (e.g., Bean and Metzner 1985;Bean and Bradley 1986;Bean and Metzner 1985;Cabrera et al 1993), and others finding few no direct effects of adjustment variables on the either academic performance or the decision to withdraw from college (Chartrand 1992).…”
Section: Outcomes Of Adjustment To Collegementioning
confidence: 96%
“…In addition to regular academic demands and workloads, distance students have to self-organize and self-regulate in autonomous learning environments (e.g., Bothma and Monteith 2004), to overcome potential social isolation in virtual teaching environments (e.g., Kim et al 2011;Slagter van Tryon and Bishop 2009), and have to deal effectively with a variety of technologies needed for teaching and learning as well as for social integration (e.g., Poellhuber and Anderson 2011;Finch and Jacobs 2012) in order to succeed at university. Nontraditional students, on the other hand, have to deal with a variety of additional challenges above and beyond academic demands such as professional or family obligations (e.g., Fairchild 2003;Kohler Giancola et al 2009), and relatedly, with the need for adequate resources or support systems for succeeding at university (e.g., Quimby and O'Brien 2004;Chartrand 1992). Thus, there are good theoretical and empirical reasons to assume that nontraditional students not only show higher enrollment rates in distance education programs, but also face a particularly high risk to drop out from these programs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%