2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-2285-3_85
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Empirical Study on Potential and Risks of Twitter Data for Predicting Election Outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As result, we found that studies on Asia (73% of success) and Latin America (71%) performed better than studies on Europe (63%) and Anglo-America (54%), despite the prevalence of studies being performed on the U.S. Moreover, studies on developing economies achieved more success (74%) than on developed economies (57%), challenging the conclusions presented by Koli [34], who argued that predictions yield better results in developed countries. In terms of the approach used, the use of a volume or sentiment was not a good approach: only 55% of the 64 studies that used this approach obtained success, in contrast to 89% of the 19 studies that did not use volume or sentiment.…”
Section: Table VIII Number Of Days Between Prediction and Elections Datescontrasting
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As result, we found that studies on Asia (73% of success) and Latin America (71%) performed better than studies on Europe (63%) and Anglo-America (54%), despite the prevalence of studies being performed on the U.S. Moreover, studies on developing economies achieved more success (74%) than on developed economies (57%), challenging the conclusions presented by Koli [34], who argued that predictions yield better results in developed countries. In terms of the approach used, the use of a volume or sentiment was not a good approach: only 55% of the 64 studies that used this approach obtained success, in contrast to 89% of the 19 studies that did not use volume or sentiment.…”
Section: Table VIII Number Of Days Between Prediction and Elections Datescontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…In 2018, Kwak [33] presented results of a survey including 69 papers which supported the argument that SM can be used in understanding political agenda, rather than in election forecast. Ultimately, most recent studies [34] [35] presented limited nonsystematic surveys, both analyzing 13 papers, adding some arguments to the original review from Gayo-Avello [30]. Koli [34] argued that prediction using Twitter can have better results in developed countries, due to a higher literacy rate and internet access, than in developing countries.…”
Section: B Analysis Of Previous Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Aunque la literatura actual ha demostrado que los datos de los medios sociales pueden representar en algunos casos la emoción del público y la intención de los votantes utilizando un modelo apropiado de extracción de datos [8], hay menor cantidad de estudios de caso en países en desarrollo que muestren una fusión de técnicas específicas para lograr el objetivo de predecir el resultado político en las elecciones presidenciales [9], [10].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified