2002
DOI: 10.1068/p01sp
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Empirical Study of the Traditional Mach Card Effect

Abstract: The traditional achromatic Mach card effect is an example of lightness inconstancy and a demonstration of how shape and lightness perception interact. We present a quantitative study of this phenomenon and explore the conditions under which it occurs. The results demonstrate that observers show lightness constancy only when sufficient information is available about the light-source position, and the perceptual task required of them is surface identification rather than direct colour-appearance matching. An ana… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The visual system can only partially discount these factors to achieve lightness constancy, for example through the use of stereo cues (8,42,43) or relatively simple heuristics for interpreting luminance changes (10,44). In our case, objects were uniformly colored and not occluded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The visual system can only partially discount these factors to achieve lightness constancy, for example through the use of stereo cues (8,42,43) or relatively simple heuristics for interpreting luminance changes (10,44). In our case, objects were uniformly colored and not occluded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, Katz's term 'articulation' has come to denote whatever attributes of the visual field enable color constancy's success. Candidates that have been suggested include the numerosity of objects (Koffka, 1935;Linnell & Forster, 2002), variations of colors in the visual field (Mausfeld & Andres, 2002), spatial location (Schirillo & Shevell, 2002), the threedimensional structure of the space (Bloj & Hurlbert, 2002;Katz, 1935) and finally what Kraft, Maloney and Brainard call 'valid' cues (Kraft et al, 2002). See Gilchrist, A.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In parallel with direct assessment of the perception of the light field, the past decade has seen a slew of papers that study how the visual system achieves color and lightness constancy in the context of spatially complex light fields (e.g., Bloj & Hurlbert, 2002;Bloj, Kersten, & Hurlbert, 1999;Bloj et al, 2004;Boyaci, Doerschner, & Maloney, 2004;Boyaci et al, 2006;Boyaci, Maloney, & Hersh, 2003;Hedrich, Bloj, & Ruppertsberg, 2009;Kraft, Maloney, & Brainard, 2002;Ripamonti et al, 2004;Robilotto & Zaidi, 2004;Snyder, Doerschner, & Maloney, 2005;Todd, Norman, & Mingolla, 2004;Werner, 2006;Yang & Maloney, 2001;Yang & Shevell, 2002;Zaidi & Bostic, 2008). Important earlier work includes Gilchrist (1977Gilchrist ( , 1980, Hochberg and Beck (1954), Ikeda, Shinoda, andMizokami (1998), andPessoa, Mingolla, andArend (1996).…”
Section: Complex Light Fields and Surface Color/lightness Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 98%