2012
DOI: 10.1108/09684881211219424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An empirical study of state university students' perceived service quality

Abstract: PurposeThis paper aims to identify: university students' perceived service quality dimensions; the dimensions contributing most towards overall students' perceived service quality; and whether there is a difference in perceived quality level of each dimension based on students' year of study and gender in the context of undergraduate students of state universities in Indonesia.Design/methodology/approachThe study uses a quantitative approach through a survey method. The respondents of this study are 155 state … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
53
0
10

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(76 reference statements)
3
53
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is consistent with Clemes et al's (2007) empirical results that students' perceptions of the primary dimensions have a positive and significant impact on their overall perceptions of service quality. In addition, Sumaedi et al (2012) find that seven dimensions of service quality (e.g. curriculum, facilities, contact personal) have a positive impact on overall service quality in two state universities in Indonesia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This finding is consistent with Clemes et al's (2007) empirical results that students' perceptions of the primary dimensions have a positive and significant impact on their overall perceptions of service quality. In addition, Sumaedi et al (2012) find that seven dimensions of service quality (e.g. curriculum, facilities, contact personal) have a positive impact on overall service quality in two state universities in Indonesia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Institutional support facilities include physical facilities, information technology-related equipment and facilities, research-related services, libraries and recreational facilities (Kwek et al 2010 ;Peng and Samah 2006 ). These facilities provided a conducive environment for the cognitive and behavioural development of students and contribute towards meaningful learning outcomes (Dawson et al 2010 ;Fenandes et al 2013 ;Helgesen and Nesset 2007 ;Ginns and Ellis 2009 ;Nadiri et al 2009 ;Serenko 2011 ;Sohail and Shaikh 2004 ;Sumaedi et al 2012 ;Tam 2006 ;Teo and Soutar 2012 ).…”
Section: Institutional Support Facilitiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Ti su izazovi sve veći broj privatnih visokih učilišta, studija koji su raspoloživi međunarodnim studentima, pristup studijama s bilo kojeg mjesta zahvaljujući tehnologiji, većim školarinama i drugim troškovima s kojima se suočavaju studenti te svakako potražnjom za fleksibilnim putovima učenja (Yeo, 2008;Sumaedi et al, 2012). Visokoškolske ustanove od velikog su značaja za funkcioniranje društva u cjelini.…”
Section: Uvodunclassified