2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2020.106444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An empirical study of performance using Clone & Own and Software Product Lines in an industrial context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, they do not define features at a domain level in a formal model, and these features are not consistently documented or made explicit in the code assets. While some organizations adopt a clone-and-own approach [31,74] to handle variability, with many disadvantages [23,32], our work focuses on object-oriented variability-rich systems that manage variability in a single codebase.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, they do not define features at a domain level in a formal model, and these features are not consistently documented or made explicit in the code assets. While some organizations adopt a clone-and-own approach [31,74] to handle variability, with many disadvantages [23,32], our work focuses on object-oriented variability-rich systems that manage variability in a single codebase.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It needs to filter out the code that is not going to be reused to develop the new tool, which may be time-consuming due to functionalities scattering or code coupling. In contrast, these tasks are not necessary for using an SPL approach, because here the reuse is systematic and the developer works only with the features to be reused [17].…”
Section: Motivation and Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These facts suggest that the tasks are nontrivial. Furthermore, the domain used in this experiment has already been used in previous works [24] [40]. The domain threat appears since we only analyzed the induction hob domain.…”
Section: Threats To Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%