DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-69566-0_34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Empirical Study Identifying High Perceived Value Practices of CMMI Level 2

Abstract: Abstract.We have conducted face-to-face questionnaire based interview sessions with twenty-three Malaysian software practitioners in order to determine the perceived value associated with the specific practices of "requirements management", "process and product quality assurance" and "configuration management" process areas of CMMI level 2 in the stage representation. The objective of this study is to identify the extent to which a CMMI practice is used in order to develop a finer-grained framework, which enco… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In more recent works, Niazi et al (2008) and Niazi and Babar (2009) attempt to establish the perceived value of the specific practices of the following CMMI level 2 process areas: requirements management, process and product quality assurance and configuration management. These studies acknowledge the need for finer granularity in relation to the perceived value of different software processes and SPI practices.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In more recent works, Niazi et al (2008) and Niazi and Babar (2009) attempt to establish the perceived value of the specific practices of the following CMMI level 2 process areas: requirements management, process and product quality assurance and configuration management. These studies acknowledge the need for finer granularity in relation to the perceived value of different software processes and SPI practices.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously we have published, using Malaysian data, a primary study of only three process areas of CMMI level 2 [34]. This paper is a revised and substantially extended version in which we present findings from an empirical study, with Malaysian and Vietnamese practitioners, that was aimed at further identifying the relative ''perceived value" of practices of six CMMI level 2 process areas.…”
Section: Research Background and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, many software development firms have adopted SPI programs in an attempt to overcome the problem of the delivery of low quality software products and seek to produce higher quality products. Scholars have posited the benefits of SPI programs, which include reduced project cycle time, reduced developmental cost, improved staff productivity, improved customer satisfaction, and improved software quality (Krishnan and Keller, 1999;Niazi and Babar, 2009;Sulayman, Urquhart, Mendes and Seidel, 2012;Dalton, 2016;Laporte and O'Connor, 2016). It is argued that the development and delivery of high quality software products can enhance the success rate of information systems projects, as well as increase the competitiveness of these firms (Kamel et al, 2009;Qureshi, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%