2008 International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering 2008
DOI: 10.1109/csse.2008.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Empirical Research on Relationship between Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance the Evidence from the Listed Companies and Informatization Power 500 in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also similar to the evidence provided by Yusr et al (2014), Yusr et al (2012), and Akgün et al (2014) who also include the marketing capability and learning capability in their studies linking TQM to the organization. The second finding is compatible with prior studies that confirmed the significant role of IT capability on the performance of organizations, such as by Bharadwaj (2000), Lin (2007), Bi and Zhang (2008), Yu andXin-quan (2011), andOng andChen (2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is also similar to the evidence provided by Yusr et al (2014), Yusr et al (2012), and Akgün et al (2014) who also include the marketing capability and learning capability in their studies linking TQM to the organization. The second finding is compatible with prior studies that confirmed the significant role of IT capability on the performance of organizations, such as by Bharadwaj (2000), Lin (2007), Bi and Zhang (2008), Yu andXin-quan (2011), andOng andChen (2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Similarly, there is a bulk of researches available from the literature proving that IT capability has a direct impact on organizational performance. Interestingly, some report on the direct significant effect (Bharadwaj, 2000;Lin, 2007;Bi & Zhang, 2008;Yu & Xin-quan, 2011;Ong & Chen, 2013) and other ones questioned this relationship arguing that IT capability can only influence firm performance indirectly through some mediating variables (Tippins & Sohi, 2003;Zhu & Nakata, 2007;Pérez-López & Alegre, 2012). The confusing report indicates the need to examine the effect of IT capability in the model as the mediating factor.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The enterprise outcome comprises three factors such as improvement of customer satisfaction, enhancement of organizational competition power, and advancement of organizational image [11]. In non-financial research, the performance of a firm was examined by efficiency, effectiveness, profitability, quality of service, client satisfaction, and productivity [6]- [9], [11], [12], [15]. This is their satisfaction level about their firm's outcome in terms of growth in sale, increase in profits, and expansion in market share [12].…”
Section: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With investigating these previous studies, this research generates the measurement factors and items to gauge enterprise outcome in terms of a smart business (SB) as follows: SB execution performance (quality of services, efficiency of business process, and client satisfaction), SB increase performance (sale increase, sale revenue increase, market increase), SB benefit performance (increase of gain in annual profit, net income increase, and cash turnover ratio), and SB competitiveness performance (sale increase rate and customer share) [6], [7], [9], [10], [12]- [15]. Our research utilize these articles as measures to gauge the enterprise SB performance through the verification process of validity analysis and reliability analysis according to the criterion of previous literature.…”
Section: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previous literature presents the enterprise performance in a variety of perspectives [4]- [16]. The measurement variables of firm performance are operational performance (inventory turnover and accounts receivable turnover), growth performance (sale revenue growth), and profitability performance (sales gross and profit margin) [5]. Enterprise performance includes process performance and outcome performance.…”
Section: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%