An empirical investigation of corporate entrepreneurship intensity in the casual dining sector

Brizek, Michael G.; Khan, Mahmood Hasan

doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2006.07.008

Cited by 11 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 45 publications

(11 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These studies are timely as conflicting evidence regarding the CEAI's validity had emerged since it was first introduced nearly a decade ago (cf. Adonisi, ; Brizek, ; Hornsby et al., ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Moreover, a notable, and somewhat concerning, methodological limitation of prior research has been the complete absence of any assessment of the CEAI's content validity. Previous research has tested the factor structure of the CEAI with mixed findings (Adonisi, ; Brizek, ; Hornsby et al., ), and no study has examined the content validity of the instrument—a step that has been labeled as critical before an instrument is used in research settings (Hinkin, ). In our current study, we provide a test of the items' content validity, ensuring that each factor of the CEAI is represented by a parsimonious set of items that are conceptually distinct from each other before examining the instrument's structural or convergent validity (Nunnally and Bernstein, ).…”

Section: Motivations For Conceptual Advances To Research On Cementioning

confidence: 99%

“…The factor structure of the CEAI, for instance, has been since studied and found to produce inconsistent findings (cf. Adonisi, ; Brizek, ; Hornsby et al., ). Second, assessments of validity should be as comprehensive as possible, so as to reduce the effects of error and artifacts that produce erroneous conclusions.…”

Section: Theoretical Foundations Of the Ceaimentioning

confidence: 99%

“…() presented. Brizek (), for instance, did not test the factor structure of the instrument; the organizational boundaries dimension, however, was problematic as the estimates of internal consistency were below the .70 threshold in both his pilot and post tests (α = .69; α = .61). Hornsby et al.…”

Section: Study 2—structural Validitymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Assessing a Measurement of Organizational Preparedness for Corporate Entrepreneurship

Hornsby¹,

Kuratko²,

Holt³

et al. 2013

J of Product Innov Manag

137

172

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research has shown that the manifestation of corporate entrepreneurship is an important strategy for the success of private‐ and public‐sector organizations. The Corporate Entrepreneurship Assessment Instrument (CEAI) is an instrument that was developed to measure the key internal organizational factors that influence a firm's entrepreneurial activities and outcomes. The present research employs three studies to assess the content, construct, and convergent validity of the CEAI using a well‐established framework for scale development and refinement. The CEAI was found to be a relatively stable instrument, although the factor structure that emerged varied slightly from the original instrument. In sum, as a result of our analyses, a more parsimonious and psychometrically sound set of items for each factor was derived yielding an 18‐item instrument based upon the original 48‐item measure. Our studies of the CEAI present a timely contribution toward advancing research in the area of organizational preparedness for corporate entrepreneurship.

show abstract

“…These studies are timely as conflicting evidence regarding the CEAI's validity had emerged since it was first introduced nearly a decade ago (cf. Adonisi, ; Brizek, ; Hornsby et al., ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Motivations For Conceptual Advances To Research On Cementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Theoretical Foundations Of the Ceaimentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Study 2—structural Validitymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Assessing a Measurement of Organizational Preparedness for Corporate Entrepreneurship

Hornsby¹,

Kuratko²,

Holt³

et al. 2013

J of Product Innov Manag

137

172

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Additionally, a large number of studies have analyzed the relationship between CE and performance within high-tech or low-tech industries. However, only one of the studies analyzed the relationship within the service industry (i.e., Brizek and Khan 2007). The service sectors may also provide scope for significant CE activities (Phan et al 2009).…”

Section: Moderatorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Corporate entrepreneurship and performance: A meta-analysis

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Despite considerable research, empirical findings on the relationship between corporate entrepreneurship (CE) (i.e., strategic renewal, innovation and corporate venturing) and performance remain inconclusive. Using a meta-analysis, the present paper synthesizes prior literature regarding the CE-performance relationship of 43 independent samples including 13,237 firms. Our results reveal that strategic renewal, innovation and corporate venturing positively influence overall, subjective and objective firm performance. In addition, we conduct moderator analyses to reflect on the context and to verify whether and how the relationships vary in the presence of several studyspecific factors. We find that innovation has a stronger effect on performance in high-tech as opposed to lowtech industries, and the association between corporate venturing and performance is the strongest in Europe (compared with North America and Asia). Against our theoretical predictions, we find the association between strategic renewal and performance to be stronger for larger than for smaller firms. Based on our results, we derive recommendations for future research and point to managerial implications.

show abstract

Tourism workforce research: A review, taxonomy and agenda

Baum

Kralj

Robinson

et al. 2016

Annals of Tourism Research

214

128

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper offers a critical review, purview and future view of 'workforce' research. We argue that the tourism (and hospitality) workforce research domain, beyond being neglected relative to its importance, suffers from piecemeal approaches at topic, analytical, theoretical and methods levels. We adopt a three-tiered macro, meso and micro level framework into which we map the five pervasive themes from our systematic review across a 10 year period (2005-2014). A critique of the literature, following a 'representations' narrative, culminates in the modelling of a tourism workforce taxonomy, which we propose should guide the acknowledgement and advancement of more holistic tourism workforce knowledge development.

show abstract

An empirical investigation of corporate entrepreneurship intensity in the casual dining sector

Cited by 11 publications

References 45 publications

Assessing a Measurement of Organizational Preparedness for Corporate Entrepreneurship

Assessing a Measurement of Organizational Preparedness for Corporate Entrepreneurship

Corporate entrepreneurship and performance: A meta-analysis

Tourism workforce research: A review, taxonomy and agenda

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About