The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1998
DOI: 10.1088/0953-4075/31/16/020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An empirical expression for K-shell ionization cross section by electron impact

Abstract: An empirical expression is proposed to describe the K-shell ionization cross sections by electron impact over a wide range of atomic numbers (i.e. 6 Z 79) and overvoltages U (i.e. 1 U 10 4 ) defined as being the ratio between the incident electron energy and the ionization energy of the electrons in the K shell. The study is based on the analysis of existing experimental databases for atoms. Agreement is obtained with an accuracy of 10% over the entire atomic number and overvoltage ranges including the near-th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

11
102
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(68 reference statements)
11
102
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A good agreement is also observed for the empirical models of Haque et al [21] and Hombourger [22]. Beyond the dip (ε > 10 MeV), the relativistic rise is steeper than in our model in both ab initio calculations (MRBEB and DWB/PWB) as well as in the fitted cross sections of Haque et al [21] and Hombourger [22]. Following the suggestion of Davies et al [1], the density-effect correction has been incorporated into the MRBEB model and the result is plotted in this figure.…”
Section: Calculationssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A good agreement is also observed for the empirical models of Haque et al [21] and Hombourger [22]. Beyond the dip (ε > 10 MeV), the relativistic rise is steeper than in our model in both ab initio calculations (MRBEB and DWB/PWB) as well as in the fitted cross sections of Haque et al [21] and Hombourger [22]. Following the suggestion of Davies et al [1], the density-effect correction has been incorporated into the MRBEB model and the result is plotted in this figure.…”
Section: Calculationssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…the modified relativistic binary encounter Bethe (MRBEB) model of Guerra et al [11] and the combination of distorted-wave-Born and plane-wave-Born (DWB/PWB) models of Bote et al [20]. A good agreement is also observed for the empirical models of Haque et al [21] and Hombourger [22]. Beyond the dip (ε > 10 MeV), the relativistic rise is steeper than in our model in both ab initio calculations (MRBEB and DWB/PWB) as well as in the fitted cross sections of Haque et al [21] and Hombourger [22].…”
Section: Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that the low-energy part of fðEÞ corresponds to a power-law function with a decreasing trend given by the parameter . This provides a better fit to the distribution than the commonly used Maxwellian functions (red dashed lines), especially in the energy range 30 keV-5 MeV, where the Ag and Sn K-shell cross sections [31] (blue solid line with squares) are higher. The power law distribution function results in a good reproduction of the absolute K yields obtained experimentally, as described below.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A K emission module, based on the model of Ref. [31], is used to calculate the K signal yields and size for comparison with experiment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%