2013
DOI: 10.1080/14783363.2012.677306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An empirical examination of the impact of quality tools application on business performance: Evidence from Serbia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, in this article, a model that considers organizational cultures, 8,23,4951,53,57,5964 quality improvement tools and methodologies, 26,44,65–71 and business performance levels 16,17,28,39,41,44,56,62,72,73 is presented. Most survey questions used were drawn from existing surveys.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, in this article, a model that considers organizational cultures, 8,23,4951,53,57,5964 quality improvement tools and methodologies, 26,44,65–71 and business performance levels 16,17,28,39,41,44,56,62,72,73 is presented. Most survey questions used were drawn from existing surveys.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using quality tools as an essential part of quality improvement has been proven to be an important element of a successful quality management practice, such that different quality tools influence different business performance indicators. 44 Six Sigma methods may improve company performance levels because they better address organizational needs, 45 while other companies may benefit from lean manufacturing practices in terms of firm profitability levels 46 and other forms of business performance. 47 One rare study on manufacturing company supply chain management quality levels is presented in Sila et al, 48 while Kannan and Tan, 13 Yeung 14 and Robinson and Malhotra 20 show that quality management practice usage among supply chain partners improves business performance.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to a research conducted among Serbian companies [27] only quality tools for reviewing current condition (for decision making) have an important impact on financial performance measures. Some findings suggest that the cancelled ISO 9001 certificate could be understood as an early external signal indicating possible business problems in the organization [28].…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, employees factors constructs Communication, Reward system and Conflicts contained 5 dimensions each, while construct Training had 3 dimensions. Lean Six sigma construct, as given in Spasojevic Brkic et al (2014), was described through 4 dimensions -5S workplace organization methodology, Kanban, Poka-Yoke and DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, and Control) or DMADV (Define, Measure, Analyze, Design, and Validate), while employees performances were described through 5 dimensions -employee satisfaction, absenteeism, salaries and benefits, employees' commitment and employee turnover rate, that are adopted from references (Skerlavaj et al, 2007;Spasojevic Brkic et al, 2013) and given in Table 1.…”
Section: Samplementioning
confidence: 99%