An Empirical Comparison of TOPSIS and VIKOR for Ranking Decision-Making Models

Samal, Sidharth; Dash, Rajashree

doi:10.1007/978-981-16-9873-6_39

Cited by 6 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It is praised for its simplicity, rationality, comprehensibility, good computational efficiency, and ability to measure the relative performance for each alternative in a simple mathematical form. However, it has been criticized for its potential issues with criteria and alternatives interdependence [ [46] , [47] , [48] ]. EDAS is another MCDM method that has been noted for its applicability and fewer number of calculations compared to other methods [ 49 ].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Optimizing photovoltaic thermal (PVT) collector selection: A multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach for renewable energy systems

Hosouli,

Gaikwad,

Qamar

et al. 2024

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Optimizing photovoltaic thermal (PVT) collector selection: A multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach for renewable energy systems

Hosouli,

Gaikwad,

Qamar

et al. 2024

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Recently, MCDM, based on interval estimates, has been developed. For example, extended both TOPSIS and VIKOR methods were described, [ 42 , 43 ] while their advantages and drawbacks were reported in [ 44 , 45 , 46 ]. In this paper, the authors consider the possibility to implement the AHP and VIKOR ones for solving the problem of the DMS (PMMA-based) for manufacturing RCD (including the temporary ones).…”

Section: Data Interpretation—the Combined Ahp–extended Vikor Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dental Material Selection for the Additive Manufacturing of Removable Complete Dentures (RCD)

Grachev

Chizhmakov

Stepanov

et al. 2023

IJMS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research addresses the development of a formalized approach to dental material selection (DMS) in manufacturing removable complete dentures (RDC). Three types of commercially available polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) grades, processed by an identical Digital Light Processing (DLP) 3D printer, were compared. In this way, a combination of mechanical, tribological, technological, microbiological, and economic factors was assessed. The material indices were calculated to compare dental materials for a set of functional parameters related to feedstock cost. However, this did not solve the problem of simultaneous consideration of all the material indices, including their significance. The developed DMS procedure employs the extended VIKOR method, based on the analysis of interval quantitative estimations, which allowed the carrying out of a fully fledged analysis of alternatives. The proposed approach has the potential to enhance the efficiency of prosthetic treatment by optimizing the DMS procedure, taking into consideration the prosthesis design and its production route.

show abstract

“…The AHP, TOPSIS, VIKOR, ELECTRE and PROMETHEE multicriteria optimization methods are among the most well-known ones [10,17,18]. Many published papers have been devoted to a comparison and evaluation of their capabilities [19][20][21]. Earlier, in an article by the authors [5], it was shown that it is sufficient to use the combined AHP-VIKOR method for solving the problems of the selection of dental materials.…”

Section: Development Of the Quality Assessment Criteria And Ranking O...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Ranking Technologies of Additive Manufacturing of Removable Complete Dentures by the Results of Their Mechanical Testing

Grachev,

Zolotnitsky,

Stepanov

et al. 2023

Dentistry Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this study, a methodology was developed for ranking manufacturing technologies of removable complete dentures (RCDs) according to the results of their full-scale mechanical tests. The actuality of the study is motivated by establishing the advantages and drawbacks of 3D-printed RCDs in contrast with ones manufactured via an analog protocol. The RCDs were fabricated via four technological routes that included various combinations of subtractive technologies (hot polymerization/HP and CAD/CAM milling) and additive manufacturing (digital light processing/DLP) ones and the installation of commercially available cosmetic denture teeth (DT). In the mechanical tests, different blocks of teeth (incisors, canines, premolars and molars) were loaded. To solve the ranking problem, it was proposed to interpret the results of the mechanical tests in terms of the reliability, durability and compliance/stiffness criteria. For this purpose, the combined AHP-VIKOR method was applied. In addition, a computer simulation of the mechanical loading conditions and the response of the RCDs was performed based on the finite element method (FEM). As the key conclusion, it was stated that additive manufacturing (AM) methods are competitive and cost-effective techniques for the fabrication of RCDs.

show abstract

An Empirical Comparison of TOPSIS and VIKOR for Ranking Decision-Making Models

Cited by 6 publications

References 16 publications

Optimizing photovoltaic thermal (PVT) collector selection: A multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach for renewable energy systems

Optimizing photovoltaic thermal (PVT) collector selection: A multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach for renewable energy systems

Dental Material Selection for the Additive Manufacturing of Removable Complete Dentures (RCD)

Ranking Technologies of Additive Manufacturing of Removable Complete Dentures by the Results of Their Mechanical Testing

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About